Logos/Watermarks on content images.

RawAlex · 2005-03-30, 11:17 AM

Nekrom, I think I spotted your problem.

You are taking stuff that is already watermarked, and you are adding a VERY prominent watermark over it. The blue band across all the content is VERY annoying to look at. Is there a reason why you put that large blue band all the way across, rather than just adding your URL below the existing watermark?

Images like this:

http://www.evil-porn.com/bdsm/Clip0433.jpg
or
http://www.evil-porn.com/bdsm/Clip0359.jpg

the content is obscured or otherwise impeded by the logos. On top of it, it is TERRIBLE video caps, many link sites won't list it. I personally cannot list it, because you have penetration on a bound subject (which is not a good idea in Canada).

Alex

2005-03-30, 11:17 AM	#13
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Nekrom, I think I spotted your problem. You are taking stuff that is already watermarked, and you are adding a VERY prominent watermark over it. The blue band across all the content is VERY annoying to look at. Is there a reason why you put that large blue band all the way across, rather than just adding your URL below the existing watermark? Images like this: http://www.evil-porn.com/bdsm/Clip0433.jpg or http://www.evil-porn.com/bdsm/Clip0359.jpg the content is obscured or otherwise impeded by the logos. On top of it, it is TERRIBLE video caps, many link sites won't list it. I personally cannot list it, because you have penetration on a bound subject (which is not a good idea in Canada). Alex