|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 504
|
What does comply with google TOS mean??
And what does the page being W3C compliant mean??
__________________
Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html Check for W3C Compliancy: http://validator.w3.org/ @Linkster: I have to admit that I didn't do too much research on SEO lately (and didn't visit the SEO forums at all in the last month), but I was still thinking that the PR updates are on a quarterly basis. If that's wrong, what's the time frame between the updates then nowadays? And sorry, but I still don't go with your comment that the Toolbar PR is complete BS, because I still think it's at least somewhat relevant directly after an update. btw: I like reading your posts, pretty informative ;-)
__________________
<a href="http://click.netpondcash.com:8080/ct?id=29560&bn=1143"><img src="http://banners.uncovered.com/netpondcash/netpondcash_120x60.gif" border="0"> Sign Up for HIGH CONVERTING sites</a> |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Monsieur - theyve been doing the Page Rank updates randomly -
Here's a small list: Google toolbar Page Rank update / time since previous update April 22, 2005 / 111 days January 1, 2005 / 87 days October 6, 2004 /106 days June 22, 2004 / 22 days May 31, 2004 / 38 days April 23, 2004 / 16 days April 7, 2004 / 22 days March 16, 2004 / 50 days January 26, 2004 / 15 days December 23, 2003 / 17 days December 6, 2003 / 20 days The other important factor in this is this is just when they update the toolbar PR numbers - not the actual Page Ranks The Google Directory has a much better history of being almost monthly for its PR indicator updates - remember that the Directory indicator is 8 places compared to the toolbar which is based on 10. As far as the toolbar PR being useless/BS - this was just my opinion based on the fact that Google has stated that the backlinks indicator in the toolbar has been scrambled on purpose (happened due to a SEO recommending it to Googles rep at a SEO show back in early 2004)- and the site: command has been changed recently to not include the site scrapers and hijackers 302 redirects (this was Googles response to many complaints about scrapers and 302s). This leads me to believe that Google has also scrambled the code for the toolbar PR to give people trying to SEO more confusion - as well as the fact that the PR indicated can be manipulated by anyone with a little savvy - if you wanted a page to show PR10 on the toolbar you could do it within 2 days with no problem (of course it would be stupid to show ya'll how) ![]() The main part of the toolbar PR being BS is that the numbers they are showing, just like the backlinks, dont match pages in the directory which has always been a much better relative ranking and PR indicator and closely matches the SERP rankings where the real Page Rank is taken into account. I believe in an old article I wrote for Adult Buzz or one of the other web pubs I had stated that over 100 factors on and off page really go into the "actual" Page Rank - based on the Google founders original page rank paper and testing that we did to try to rank the importance of the factors - these factors are still just as important and far outweigh the indicated PR on the toolbar which brought me to my conclusion that using the little green bar is useless - add to that Google's neverending attempts to mislead SEOs trying to game them (which they are very good at and have engineers that do nothing but these types of projects) I would say that looking at the actual high ranking pages and studying why they rank so high (the real Page Rank effects) is a much better use of time ![]() Sorry - too much coffee this morning |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||
Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20
|
Hey Linkster, sorry but I need to answer again (You probably feel like talking to some shit talking n00b, but I'm not like that ;-), I just have some other point of views on some things, which you think are wrong ;-))
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But it doesn't do you any good, because you don't benefit from that stupid toolbar PR10 shown for your site ;-) Some of these fake sites do very well on eBay, though...although it's just BSing the buyers... Quote:
__________________
<a href="http://click.netpondcash.com:8080/ct?id=29560&bn=1143"><img src="http://banners.uncovered.com/netpondcash/netpondcash_120x60.gif" border="0"> Sign Up for HIGH CONVERTING sites</a> |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Quote:
![]() And you are correct about the last 3 updates - they have been looking like quarterly changes - Im not sure that is really intentional other than Google trying to "mislead or roust the WMs" a little ![]() As far as the manual update and the guy at Google pushing a button - you'd be amazed at how they really do it - and yes it is just a little red button ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 504
|
Quote:
![]() Just a question about the google guidelines: They say: "Don't create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content. Avoid "doorway" pages created just for search engines, or other "cookie cutter" approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content. " But isn't this just what all free sites are like with highly duplicated mirror sites??
__________________
Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Quote:
![]() There are a bunch of old threads here on the LL forum that delve into the best way to do your free sites to avoid that TOS statement from Google - Id do a quick search over there for "doorway pages" and Im sure you will find loads of discussions from the past ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|