|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip!
|
<shameless plug>
Among my talents I am also a programmer. I am considering writing a program in Java to fulfill common needs of finding where images files are being used in your html pages are constructing a resulting html/xml file for your reports. If enough people express interest in this type of a program I'll go ahead with it. I might even expand on that idea if enough people send me feature requests. And yes, I'll put a demo version of my program available on my server to show what I'm up to if I go ahead rather than "send me money." For those interested: PM me directly <DON'T send this via the 'Post Reply' feature>. </shameless plug> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool
|
This law has been in effect for some time and we have complied in it's entirety except for the changes lately that require references to actual depictions cross-referenced to names of performers. So, beyond the paperwork that everyone has to do, why is there such a panic? Other than the actual place of business has to be published? Wouldn't webmasters have this information by now anyway since this law has been around a while? I see "2257 compliance" on a lot of websites which tells me that ID's are in place, yet I see on here a lot of freaking-out because those same websites don't have the info? I'm not understanding this at all.
![]()
__________________
The Woman with a Surprise |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|