2257 regs published in full

LindaMight · 2005-05-28, 11:08 AM

This law has been in effect for some time and we have complied in it's entirety except for the changes lately that require references to actual depictions cross-referenced to names of performers. So, beyond the paperwork that everyone has to do, why is there such a panic? Other than the actual place of business has to be published? Wouldn't webmasters have this information by now anyway since this law has been around a while? I see "2257 compliance" on a lot of websites which tells me that ID's are in place, yet I see on here a lot of freaking-out because those same websites don't have the info? I'm not understanding this at all.

2005-05-28, 11:08 AM	#11
LindaMight Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Up there and down here Posts: 258	This law has been in effect for some time and we have complied in it's entirety except for the changes lately that require references to actual depictions cross-referenced to names of performers. So, beyond the paperwork that everyone has to do, why is there such a panic? Other than the actual place of business has to be published? Wouldn't webmasters have this information by now anyway since this law has been around a while? I see "2257 compliance" on a lot of websites which tells me that ID's are in place, yet I see on here a lot of freaking-out because those same websites don't have the info? I'm not understanding this at all. __________________ The Woman with a Surprise