2257 regs published in full

[SexVideoContent]

Originally Posted by Tommy

you guys sound a bit paranoid

Uhh, yeah. A bit.

Alex, There is no requirement for a secondary producer to have documentation for mere topless/softcore content that is not subject to 2257.

2257 is a rare instance that shifts the burden of proof from the accuser (the DOJ) to the accused (the producer).

The 2257 statute only requires you to make documents available for inspections for the matters covered in 2257, NOT for topless and mere nudes without sexual contact.

Now if someone was dealing in genuine CP there would be a whole bunch of other problems to deal with, but it doesn't look like people promoting 'mardi gras' type sites with girls flashing are going to need to do anything differently than they have been.

As far as softcore and nude goes, the justice system in this country is still intact and one is presumed innocent unless someone else comes up with somethign proving otherwise.