2257 regs published in full

Toby · 2005-06-03, 02:34 PM

The whole premise of secondary producers having to prove a model is over 18 is flawed. The burden of proof lies with the justice system to prove that a model is under 18. That's not going to change no matter how much the authors of 2257 want it to be so.

Proof of age on model release forms has as much to do with proving the model is of legal age to be able to sign a binding contract as it does proving she's old enough to do adult content modelling.

DOJ can rewrite 2257, but they can't rewrite the 1st, 4th and 5th Constitutional amendments. Until these new regs have their day in court, I'm not going to get too excited about changing how I'm currently doing things.

2005-06-03, 02:34 PM	#32
Toby Lonewolf Internet Sales Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Houston Posts: 4,826	The whole premise of secondary producers having to prove a model is over 18 is flawed. The burden of proof lies with the justice system to prove that a model is under 18. That's not going to change no matter how much the authors of 2257 want it to be so. Proof of age on model release forms has as much to do with proving the model is of legal age to be able to sign a binding contract as it does proving she's old enough to do adult content modelling. DOJ can rewrite 2257, but they can't rewrite the 1st, 4th and 5th Constitutional amendments. Until these new regs have their day in court, I'm not going to get too excited about changing how I'm currently doing things. __________________ Latex Vixens Babes In Boots Well Heeled Women Dressing For Sex Stocking Vixens