2257 not neaded for: lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area?

ardentgent · 2005-06-09, 02:14 PM

I have just read 2257 policies from two sponsors who said that they considered pictures of the pubic area to be sexually explicit and warned us not to use them. Seems contrary to 2257 which seems to exempt E- lasivious display of the pubic area. I just don't get it.

docholly · 2005-06-09, 02:23 PM

it's like a car wreck or if you see someone pulled over by the po-po.. you know you shouldn't look at the 2257's but no matter what you just can't help it.. then you get all caught up..when really you should just drive on by until june 24 and see what happens.

|cool| of course i also subscribe to the ostrich school of reality.

2005-06-09, 02:23 PM	#2
docholly Nothing funnier than the ridiculous faces you people make mid-coitus Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sin-City USA Posts: 4,973	it's like a car wreck or if you see someone pulled over by the po-po.. you know you shouldn't look at the 2257's but no matter what you just can't help it.. then you get all caught up..when really you should just drive on by until june 24 and see what happens. \|cool\| of course i also subscribe to the ostrich school of reality. __________________ Support Indie Porn Sites OMGoddess You know you need some Bling!!

2005-06-09, 02:14 PM	#1
ardentgent Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Atlanta Ga Posts: 121	I have just read 2257 policies from two sponsors who said that they considered pictures of the pubic area to be sexually explicit and warned us not to use them. Seems contrary to 2257 which seems to exempt E- lasivious display of the pubic area. I just don't get it.