My personal thoughts on 2257

airdick · 2005-06-10, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenguy

The problem with that is that the term "2257" is only one that we as porn webmasters use - if you look at the mainstream articles on that dipshit that got sentanced last week, they just stated that he violated a Federal Law.

I'm sure every Federal Law has a number, but how often do you see it in the newspaper?

That guy wasn't originally charged with a 2257 violation anyhow, he worked out a deal to plead guilty to a 2257 charge. From what little I could find about the story, I'm not even sure he ever actually published any of the photos he took.

http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=229352

madleinx · 2005-06-10, 11:10 PM

Jim, you are the man!

I wonder what DOJ would do if the entire online adult industry simply refused to comply

I wish I had the money to take on this fight....

Here's the link to CNN's coverage of the signing of the regulations:

New rules to crack down on child pornography

What a crock.....

2005-06-10, 11:10 PM	#2
madleinx Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Big Easy, or Disneyland for Grown-Ups Posts: 120	Jim, you are the man! I wonder what DOJ would do if the entire online adult industry simply refused to comply I wish I had the money to take on this fight.... Here's the link to CNN's coverage of the signing of the regulations: New rules to crack down on child pornography What a crock..... __________________ <A HREF="http://apps.ClickCash.com/cgi/cc_refer.exe?acct=JUSTMARIE" target="_top">$40 PPS and up on FREE signups! All niches and tons of promo content!</A>