Pulling Free Sites Because Of 2257? Post The Info Here - Page 3

Jim · 2005-06-09, 09:19 PM

I won't comment until I get my new linklist running
JimandSparkysLinks. 2257 does not apply.

ngb1959 · 2005-06-10, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr Bizzaro

Link List Owners,
Please remove any galleries or Free Site links to the following domains:

http://www.amateursarchive.com
http://www.badgirlcollege.com
http://www.bigtithotties.com
http://www.collegestrokers.com
http://www.hardcorehospital.com
http://www.neighborhoodhotties.com
http://www.unclenasty.com/
http://www.universalerotica.com
http://www.xxxchangestudents.com

Thanks

How You Do Dat ??? It says something about 2257 and page is moved then goes to another page.

Let me know please.

Thanks.

nina

cd34 · 2005-06-10, 01:03 AM

<META HTTP-EQUIV=Refresh CONTENT="2; URL=http://new.domain.to/goto.html">

probably something like that.

XPorn · 2005-06-10, 01:10 AM

my-sex-links.com
links-to-free-porno.com

sites down (or coming down)

ngb1959 · 2005-06-10, 02:29 AM

Thanks CD It worked.

http://www.dreamypleasures.com/teen.html

Fonz · 2005-06-11, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CatsEye

I'll be pulling some things off

http://www.lavababes.com

Catseye, are you pulling all the freesites from that domain cause I just got another submission from with that domain.

I already pulled your previous submitted sites...

HappySmut · 2005-06-11, 12:29 PM

i just found out today i am going into a lawsuit against a private photographer over content i havnt got a chance to use yet...

if i cant trust someone who i thought was a good friend then all images will be deleted because now i just cant trust 5 years of my time to anyone.

all picture content hosted on happysmut.com will be removed and redirect to main domain on june20th.

CatsEye · 2005-06-11, 07:17 PM

"Catseye, are you pulling all the freesites from that domain cause I just got another submission from with that domain.

I already pulled your previous submitted sites..."

My apologies, Fonz; the freesites on that domain will be taken down after June 23rd if need be. I won't submit more free sites after this weekend.

Should I re-submit them to you later depending on how things shake out with the legal whoo-haw?

Thank you-
CatsEye

sue-fl · 2005-06-14, 12:55 AM

Ok a little confused about redirecting sites. I have a domain that has many sites built off it. Only a couple of them still get traffic, I doubt most of them are even listed. I'm going to pull the freesites and tgp's off line. I don't want to give up the domain name though. So if I take down the sites that are built off of this domain name I'll still be able to use it in the future right?

Oh the domain name is:

justustogether.com

Thanks!

porndragon · 2005-06-14, 01:32 AM

I run a free site most of which is sponsored content ima stick it out though

Most of my sponsors already refused to remove free content so..

Linkster · 2005-06-14, 05:58 AM

sue - most of the LLs have agreed to not blacklist for doing a 404/302 as long as its going to something mild - if it redirects to a sponsor or puts the surfer in console hell of course thats a different story - as well as leaving up sites but removing the content inside - that would not be a good approach

Boogie · 2005-06-14, 10:55 AM

I will be removing a handful of free sites that were created with pixmasters content if i cannot get the 2257 information (doubt that I can)

we'll see though.

sue-fl · 2005-06-14, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

sue - most of the LLs have agreed to not blacklist for doing a 404/302 as long as its going to something mild - if it redirects to a sponsor or puts the surfer in console hell of course thats a different story - as well as leaving up sites but removing the content inside - that would not be a good approach

Guess I didn't put it to well. I just want to get rid of the free sites and tgp's I built using that domain name I plan to delete them all together. I just want to keep my domain name in case I want to use it in the future is all. Damn it will be a year in August that I've been at this and I still know NOTHING....

Thanks Linkster for your help!

Xeno · 2005-06-14, 02:19 PM

Just as a side note....if webmasters with sites are pulling their sites off US based link lists or directories, mine is Canadian based which might help to keep some of your sites online. Although, there will still be the issue if you yourself are US based and have content that is not 2257 compliant (which is obtained from a US source); I know there is a mass panic resulting from all of this compliancy...this is where I am glad I am Canadian.

Hang in there peeps...a storm is coming, but eventually it'll clear up.

Linkster · 2005-06-14, 05:24 PM

sue - that actually works because just pulling down the free sites and tgp stuff will create a 404 so youre good to go

reaperdog · 2005-06-15, 09:55 PM

I'm probably going to be 404ing my pages from needpornnow.com/alldicksnochicks.com come June 23rd, however I don't want to piss anyone off...so I want to know if this would be acceptable:

404 page - just a filter page of niche specific links to sponsors, sponsors pop one exit console to my fake text only tgp.

Is that going too far or within the lines?

xxxjay · 2005-06-15, 10:45 PM

Jays XXX is not pulling anything.

Get yourself a lawyer and talk to him to see how 2257 really applies to you. This is something 95% of you guys haven't done and there are about 10 guys in the US that I feel are qualified to talk about this. Email me jay@occash.com and I will be happy to give you their names and numbers.

Linkster · 2005-06-16, 07:41 AM

Jay - most of these people (free site submitters) dont make $5000 in a year that it would take for the retainer to be able to talk to these lawyers - so I think most of them are playing it safe by just 404/302ing the sites until a consensus has been played out - I happen to agree that it really doesnt apply but Im not going to give out legal advice about it
Im also making it so that my free sites and galleries come up 302/404 but with the option to put them right back online with the flick of a switch

torone · 2005-06-16, 08:50 AM

For those of you who might have some of my sites listed on link lists...

I will be removing all of my free picture sites over the next week. This is being done for two reasons:
(1) I have been trying for the last six years to make money off them, with practically no success.
(2) Much of my content is from producers who did not include 2257 information. It doesn't make sense to keep them up and take the chance of becoming an example, when they are not making money.

I will be, instead, be concentrating on text-based sites (stories, etc) and adult merchandise. These areas have been doing much better in terms of profit; and I feel that I can push them up to the 'making a living' level.

http://www.assesboobscunts.com/
http://www.erectionjunction.com/
http://www.erectionsection.com/
http://www.toronessexxxden.com/
http://www.bobsdomain.com/
http://www.juanitascathouse.com/

Ramster · 2005-06-16, 09:03 AM

I agree with Jay and Linkster.

People are pulling shit all over the place and could be doing it in haste. Talk to a lawyer. However as Linkster pointed out, old free sites like these might not be making people much money so why bother to take a chance or spend money on a lawyer.

sue-fl · 2005-06-16, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

Jays XXX is not pulling anything.

Get yourself a lawyer and talk to him to see how 2257 really applies to you. This is something 95% of you guys haven't done and there are about 10 guys in the US that I feel are qualified to talk about this. Email me jay@occash.com and I will be happy to give you their names and numbers.

Geez Jay I'm make free sites and submit them. Just now getting into link list area. I can't afford a lawyer I don't make enough at this (yet) to be able to do that. So deleting my old sites that don't get traffic any more makes more sense to me than paying for a lawyer. I don't think this new 2257 is going to pass, so I can just rebuild them.

Linkster · 2005-06-16, 10:34 PM

Sue - I would say that is a very good approach - Ive got sites out there that I havent even looked at in 5 years - let alone know which defunct sponsor they go to

The important thing for everyone to keep in mind is that - if it was making you money - keep it simple to get back online - heck most big LLs out there not only are going to let you submit them again and get on the "new sites" page again - but they would have pulled them after 6 months anyway - so really no loss - and plenty of room for gain

Jay - keep in mind that 95% of the people that read your posts dont make in a year what you and others here make in a two week pay period - and even the ones of us that do have opted to save our money - play it safe - get the same legal advice that all 10 of those lawyers are giving - and when the fear,gloom and doom and the black skys have cleared - everything will be back to normal and we can just ride off into the sunset of life

Damn - now where did I put that scotch bottle

RedCow · 2005-06-17, 03:10 PM

Hi,

I was wondering what the best way to remove sites is.

1: just remove index.html, which will result in redirecting (because of htaccess) to my main page (hub without pop-ups).

2: replace index.html with a new site saying something like: closed because of 2257 and then a link to my main page.

3: ???

Which one will be preferred by most LL’s?

Thanks,
RedCow

Useless · 2005-06-17, 03:34 PM

If you must remove sites, I PREFER that you 404 or 302 to a page plain page that states the site/page has been removed with a link to where you'd like the surfer to proceed to. That's my perfect world scenario. My true preference would be that you just wait a little longer and see how the injunction and proceeding court case(s) pan out.

MadMax · 2005-06-17, 04:33 PM

I've had submitted sites dropping like flies for the last 2 or 3 days, many people are just pulling their entire domains. It amazes me how many of them are redirecting to the sponsor tours thus ensuring themselves a proud place on my blacklist.

2005-06-10, 01:03 AM	#53
cd34 a.k.a. Sparky Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: West Palm Beach, FL, USA Posts: 2,396	<META HTTP-EQUIV=Refresh CONTENT="2; URL=http://new.domain.to/goto.html"> probably something like that. __________________ SnapReplay.com a different way to share photos - iPhone & Android

2005-06-10, 01:10 AM	#54
XPorn Selling a LL? Text site? PM me Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: MI Posts: 661	my-sex-links.com links-to-free-porno.com sites down (or coming down) __________________ Free Sites? -> Free Site XXX Smut Links Gay Pervs

2005-06-10, 02:29 AM	#55
ngb1959 Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: In A Box, A Big Old Box Posts: 501	Thanks CD It worked. http://www.dreamypleasures.com/teen.html __________________ Ubuymenow Internet Shopping Dreamypleasures Free Porn

2005-06-11, 12:29 PM	#57
HappySmut Are you sure you're an accredited and honored pornographer? Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 63	i just found out today i am going into a lawsuit against a private photographer over content i havnt got a chance to use yet... if i cant trust someone who i thought was a good friend then all images will be deleted because now i just cant trust 5 years of my time to anyone. all picture content hosted on happysmut.com will be removed and redirect to main domain on june20th. __________________ <script language=JavaScript> document.write("<a href='http://stats.ars4real.com/wmref/click.php?type=but&a=1017628'>"); document.write("<img border=0 src='http://stats.ars4real.com/wmref/load.php?type=but&a=1017628'></a>");</script>

2005-06-14, 01:32 AM	#60
porndragon Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 129	I run a free site most of which is sponsored content ima stick it out though Most of my sponsors already refused to remove free content so.. __________________ Dave's Porn Links

2005-06-09, 09:19 PM	#51
Jim Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York Posts: 19,477	I won't comment until I get my new linklist running JimandSparkysLinks. 2257 does not apply.

2005-06-11, 07:17 PM	#58
CatsEye Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: May 2005 Location: Washington (no, the NICE one.) Posts: 128	"Catseye, are you pulling all the freesites from that domain cause I just got another submission from with that domain. I already pulled your previous submitted sites..." My apologies, Fonz; the freesites on that domain will be taken down after June 23rd if need be. I won't submit more free sites after this weekend. Should I re-submit them to you later depending on how things shake out with the legal whoo-haw? Thank you- CatsEye

2005-06-14, 12:55 AM	#59
sue-fl You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: May 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,837	Ok a little confused about redirecting sites. I have a domain that has many sites built off it. Only a couple of them still get traffic, I doubt most of them are even listed. I'm going to pull the freesites and tgp's off line. I don't want to give up the domain name though. So if I take down the sites that are built off of this domain name I'll still be able to use it in the future right? Oh the domain name is: justustogether.com Thanks!

2005-06-14, 05:58 AM	#61
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	sue - most of the LLs have agreed to not blacklist for doing a 404/302 as long as its going to something mild - if it redirects to a sponsor or puts the surfer in console hell of course thats a different story - as well as leaving up sites but removing the content inside - that would not be a good approach __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-14, 10:55 AM	#62
Boogie I like to blog :) Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,050	I will be removing a handful of free sites that were created with pixmasters content if i cannot get the 2257 information (doubt that I can) we'll see though. __________________ I got a porn blog! Got a blog worth linking to? Contact me

2005-06-14, 02:19 PM	#64
Xeno Do you want the job done right, or do you want it done fast? Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 494	Just as a side note....if webmasters with sites are pulling their sites off US based link lists or directories, mine is Canadian based which might help to keep some of your sites online. Although, there will still be the issue if you yourself are US based and have content that is not 2257 compliant (which is obtained from a US source); I know there is a mass panic resulting from all of this compliancy...this is where I am glad I am Canadian. Hang in there peeps...a storm is coming, but eventually it'll clear up. __________________ Why I never sleep anymore... Web Designing

2005-06-14, 05:24 PM	#65
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	sue - that actually works because just pulling down the free sites and tgp stuff will create a 404 so youre good to go __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-15, 09:55 PM	#66
reaperdog Internet! Is that thing still around? Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3	I'm probably going to be 404ing my pages from needpornnow.com/alldicksnochicks.com come June 23rd, however I don't want to piss anyone off...so I want to know if this would be acceptable: 404 page - just a filter page of niche specific links to sponsors, sponsors pop one exit console to my fake text only tgp. Is that going too far or within the lines?

2005-06-15, 10:45 PM	#67
xxxjay You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: atlanta Posts: 1,787	Jays XXX is not pulling anything. Get yourself a lawyer and talk to him to see how 2257 really applies to you. This is something 95% of you guys haven't done and there are about 10 guys in the US that I feel are qualified to talk about this. Email me jay@occash.com and I will be happy to give you their names and numbers. __________________ Circle Of Violence

2005-06-16, 07:41 AM	#68
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Jay - most of these people (free site submitters) dont make $5000 in a year that it would take for the retainer to be able to talk to these lawyers - so I think most of them are playing it safe by just 404/302ing the sites until a consensus has been played out - I happen to agree that it really doesnt apply but Im not going to give out legal advice about it Im also making it so that my free sites and galleries come up 302/404 but with the option to put them right back online with the flick of a switch __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-16, 08:50 AM	#69
torone Internet! Is that thing still around? Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 6	For those of you who might have some of my sites listed on link lists... I will be removing all of my free picture sites over the next week. This is being done for two reasons: (1) I have been trying for the last six years to make money off them, with practically no success. (2) Much of my content is from producers who did not include 2257 information. It doesn't make sense to keep them up and take the chance of becoming an example, when they are not making money. I will be, instead, be concentrating on text-based sites (stories, etc) and adult merchandise. These areas have been doing much better in terms of profit; and I feel that I can push them up to the 'making a living' level. http://www.assesboobscunts.com/ http://www.erectionjunction.com/ http://www.erectionsection.com/ http://www.toronessexxxden.com/ http://www.bobsdomain.com/ http://www.juanitascathouse.com/ __________________ Older than dirt...

2005-06-16, 09:03 AM	#70
Ramster Life is good Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 11,705	I agree with Jay and Linkster. People are pulling shit all over the place and could be doing it in haste. Talk to a lawyer. However as Linkster pointed out, old free sites like these might not be making people much money so why bother to take a chance or spend money on a lawyer. __________________ Pornstar Legends \| Live Cam Model Shows \| Hungarian Girls Skype: robmurray999

2005-06-16, 10:34 PM	#72
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Sue - I would say that is a very good approach - Ive got sites out there that I havent even looked at in 5 years - let alone know which defunct sponsor they go to The important thing for everyone to keep in mind is that - if it was making you money - keep it simple to get back online - heck most big LLs out there not only are going to let you submit them again and get on the "new sites" page again - but they would have pulled them after 6 months anyway - so really no loss - and plenty of room for gain Jay - keep in mind that 95% of the people that read your posts dont make in a year what you and others here make in a two week pay period - and even the ones of us that do have opted to save our money - play it safe - get the same legal advice that all 10 of those lawyers are giving - and when the fear,gloom and doom and the black skys have cleared - everything will be back to normal and we can just ride off into the sunset of life Damn - now where did I put that scotch bottle __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-17, 03:10 PM	#73
RedCow If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Denmark Posts: 34	Hi, I was wondering what the best way to remove sites is. 1: just remove index.html, which will result in redirecting (because of htaccess) to my main page (hub without pop-ups). 2: replace index.html with a new site saying something like: closed because of 2257 and then a link to my main page. 3: ??? Which one will be preferred by most LL’s? Thanks, RedCow __________________ RedCow's Webmaster Area - Hardlink Trades, Traffic Trades, Sponsors and a lot more...

2005-06-17, 03:34 PM	#74
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	If you must remove sites, I PREFER that you 404 or 302 to a page plain page that states the site/page has been removed with a link to where you'd like the surfer to proceed to. That's my perfect world scenario. My true preference would be that you just wait a little longer and see how the injunction and proceeding court case(s) pan out. __________________ Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.

2005-06-17, 04:33 PM	#75
MadMax "Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes" ~ Satan Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Motor City, baby, where carjacking was invented! Now GIMME THOSE SHOES! Posts: 2,385	I've had submitted sites dropping like flies for the last 2 or 3 days, many people are just pulling their entire domains. It amazes me how many of them are redirecting to the sponsor tours thus ensuring themselves a proud place on my blacklist.