Freedom Isn't Free! Fuck the FSC!

Ms Naughty · 2005-06-23, 07:45 PM

OK, I've woken up to read this news, and I'm feeling disappointed, mainly because it seems the FSC wants to negotiate this rather than fight it. Their case looked really strong and winnable, but now it looks like they're going to cave in on things.

We don't want them to water down these new rules. They need to be scrapped altogether because they are grossly unfair, burdensome and unconstitutional.

Already I find myself wondering what they're going to try for.

- Will they fight to remove the retroactive clause but agree that it's reasonable for webmasters to post their home address on the net?
- Will they say it's OK to distribute model's addresses, but only if their middle name is blacked out?
- Will they negotiate so that the DOJ can still investigate without a warrant, but they need to knock first and say the secret password?

OK... I'm getting flippant here LOL

2005-06-23, 07:45 PM	#1
Ms Naughty old enough to be Grandma Scrotum Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 1,408	OK, I've woken up to read this news, and I'm feeling disappointed, mainly because it seems the FSC wants to negotiate this rather than fight it. Their case looked really strong and winnable, but now it looks like they're going to cave in on things. We don't want them to water down these new rules. They need to be scrapped altogether because they are grossly unfair, burdensome and unconstitutional. Already I find myself wondering what they're going to try for. - Will they fight to remove the retroactive clause but agree that it's reasonable for webmasters to post their home address on the net? - Will they say it's OK to distribute model's addresses, but only if their middle name is blacked out? - Will they negotiate so that the DOJ can still investigate without a warrant, but they need to knock first and say the secret password? OK... I'm getting flippant here LOL __________________ Promote Bright Desire