2257 - Im about to be real unpopular!

PR_Tom · 2005-06-24, 01:13 PM

But thats not true, lol. Their members simply happen to be co-plaintiffs in a lawsuit! *Thats* the important bit that people are glossing over for some reason.
If you wanted to, you can use your own lawyers and join the lawsuit and have the same exact agreement. Maybe I'm the one being dense, and I'm sorry if this is already obvious to everyone. But from the tone of some posts, it seems that people feel that the FSC is only working for their members, when in FACT it's a legal proceeding and as such, the plaintiffs in the case are the ones affected by the no-inspection order.

What is the alternative? Oh judge, by the way even though theres no injunction and theres absolutely no legal basis for what I'm about to ask, but could you also tell them not to inspect anyones records anywhere on the planet? Thanks judge, you rock.

2005-06-24, 01:13 PM	#1
PR_Tom Nobody gets into heaven without a glowstick Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 423	But thats not true, lol. Their members simply happen to be co-plaintiffs in a lawsuit! Thats the important bit that people are glossing over for some reason. If you wanted to, you can use your own lawyers and join the lawsuit and have the same exact agreement. Maybe I'm the one being dense, and I'm sorry if this is already obvious to everyone. But from the tone of some posts, it seems that people feel that the FSC is only working for their members, when in FACT it's a legal proceeding and as such, the plaintiffs in the case are the ones affected by the no-inspection order. What is the alternative? Oh judge, by the way even though theres no injunction and theres absolutely no legal basis for what I'm about to ask, but could you also tell them not to inspect anyones records anywhere on the planet? Thanks judge, you rock. __________________ PimpRoll