2257 arguments

Tommy · 2005-06-24, 05:07 PM

Linkster I know you didnt mean me :-) and my daughter is doing great, walking, talking a little

that gets me thinking ....what about a single parent
cant go enroll your kids in school
cant go to parent teacher meetings
cant even drive your kids to and from school

what about jewish people
they have that holiday where they arent allowed to touch anything electronic
I guess they have to choose between viloating their religon or a federal jail sentance

the republicans Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales singled us out as a group
when he said he was gonna go after obsenity

and we cant get rid of him because with HIS law he makes it a federal crime for us to vote

Linkster · 2005-06-24, 05:14 PM

Tommy - you bring up a point that I havent seen posted anywhere - back in May this year the DOJ did something else that no one seems to care about - they formed a new task force called the OBSCENITY PROSECUTION TASK FORCE
and I havent heard word one on any board about any of the things they say they are going after - and I guarantee that they are looking to get into a lot more than this 2257 stuff

Talk about making myself a shit-stirrer LOL

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/May/05_crm_242.htm

Wenchy · 2005-06-24, 07:27 PM

I noticed that the other day reading through the whining crybaby diatribe that was the DOJ attorneys' "rebuttal" to the FSC filing... I remember thinking it was important at the time, but by the time I finished wading through all the self-serving, totally-avoiding-the-point bullshit, my brain had turned to mush and I completely forgot about it... until you mentioned it, Linkster.

I sure would like to know what's going on in THOSE meetings... or maybe I wouldn't |shocking|

mrMagoo · 2005-06-27, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Tommy - you bring up a point that I havent seen posted anywhere - back in May this year the DOJ did something else that no one seems to care about - they formed a new task force called the OBSCENITY PROSECUTION TASK FORCE
and I havent heard word one on any board about any of the things they say they are going after - and I guarantee that they are looking to get into a lot more than this 2257 stuff

Talk about making myself a shit-stirrer LOL

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/May/05_crm_242.htm

I think (very dangerous) but I'm not sure that the obscenity cases have been held up by the extreme associate case.

I heard the DOJ was going to appeal but haven't heard anything new.

Here is a link to an article:
http://www.peak.org/mailing-list/arc.../msg05988.html

Dravyk · 2005-06-28, 08:59 AM

I'd thought up a dozen different things wrong with 2257 that should get the sucker overturned ...

But I have to admit, you've come up a beauty, Tommy! And one I'd not seen elsewhere.

Good to see the Old School brains are still working.

2005-06-24, 05:07 PM	#1
Tommy NYC Boy That Moved To The Island Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 2,940	Linkster I know you didnt mean me :-) and my daughter is doing great, walking, talking a little that gets me thinking ....what about a single parent cant go enroll your kids in school cant go to parent teacher meetings cant even drive your kids to and from school what about jewish people they have that holiday where they arent allowed to touch anything electronic I guess they have to choose between viloating their religon or a federal jail sentance the republicans Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales singled us out as a group when he said he was gonna go after obsenity and we cant get rid of him because with HIS law he makes it a federal crime for us to vote __________________ Accepting New partners

2005-06-24, 05:14 PM	#2
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Tommy - you bring up a point that I havent seen posted anywhere - back in May this year the DOJ did something else that no one seems to care about - they formed a new task force called the OBSCENITY PROSECUTION TASK FORCE and I havent heard word one on any board about any of the things they say they are going after - and I guarantee that they are looking to get into a lot more than this 2257 stuff Talk about making myself a shit-stirrer LOL http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/May/05_crm_242.htm __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-24, 07:27 PM	#3
Wenchy Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Mile High City Posts: 120	I noticed that the other day reading through the whining crybaby diatribe that was the DOJ attorneys' "rebuttal" to the FSC filing... I remember thinking it was important at the time, but by the time I finished wading through all the self-serving, totally-avoiding-the-point bullshit, my brain had turned to mush and I completely forgot about it... until you mentioned it, Linkster. I sure would like to know what's going on in THOSE meetings... or maybe I wouldn't \|shocking\| __________________ I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, "I drank what?"

2005-06-28, 08:59 AM	#5
Dravyk Lord help me, I'm just not that bright Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 102	I'd thought up a dozen different things wrong with 2257 that should get the sucker overturned ... But I have to admit, you've come up a beauty, Tommy! And one I'd not seen elsewhere. Good to see the Old School brains are still working. __________________ WebmasterConventions.com Mainstream Webmasters