The Official Why Didn't My Site Get Listed At Javes Thread

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Litwa

hi :-)
why my sites was not listed, why?
http://www.titshunters.com/bustykerrystrips/index.htm with comment: We're sorry, we declined your site.

and another:

with trashin comment The reviewer felt that the site lacked quality. It didn't necessarily break any submission rules, but it simply wasn't anything we'd like to list.
http://www.titshunters.com/sexyeyesbigboobs/index.htm
they cant be so bad, do thet? :-)

Thx

On the first site, make the text in the recips legible and I'd be happy to list it. Big space for recip, but tiny text in a horrible font that I have to squint to read.

You need to work on your descriptions as well. I get tired of re-writing descriptions. It was most likely the description that tipped the scale on the second rejected site. "Sexy, real big breasted babes with perfect looking eyes work hard giving blowjob." The site itself looks ok, but if I have to continously re-write descriptions for a submitter, their sites better be outstanding.

[Litwa]

ok, thx

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

...I get tired of re-writing descriptions...

And you call yourself a reviewer?

[Jim]

Originally Posted by Greenguy

And you call yourself a reviewer?

The finest reviewer of all time. But, he does wake up just a little late at times. I think I will start doing some approving He seems to hate when I do it but the submitters love it

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Greenguy

And you call yourself a reviewer?

I'm a reviewer, not a copy writer. I edit most broken English descriptions, assuming they are paired with good sites. But occasionally, you need to let the submitter know that he or she is being more burdensome than many other submitters. Would Litwa rather have been warned about his descriptions or would he rather be silently blacklisted when I get really tired of correcting them? His sites are good and I want to list them all, but I also want to see improvement in his descriptions. The site I rejected could be resubmitted with a better description and it would get listed.

It's not my intention to be unfair to those who have learned English as a second language. Look at Vasi, for example. Reading his posts on the board tells me that he is still learning Engish, but his site descriptions are good. I don't know if he has someone else write them or if he just takes the extra time to proofread them, but they are always good and always make sense.