|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 504
|
Quote:
![]() From the other people who I respect as been very experienced in SEs they have also said that worrying too much anout this shit is giving google more credit than they deserve. Still I'd like to ask you a few questions to try and clear some things up: 1. Is any LL owner against the robots.txt thingy?? 2. If you use the robots.txt thingy will it disregard the incoming links to the pages you have stated are not to be indexed?? 3. Would this be a good approach - put in the robots.txt that all the mirrors submitted to LLs are not to be indexed and only the version of the freesite you list on your own site (which is more ad intensive) is to be indexed for SEs. This gets rid of any duplicate content/doorway issues (although these mught not be important anyway) and ensures that the ad intensive version of the freesite gets listed in SEs and not the LL version. But would you have got a higher ranking if you had allowed all versions to be indexed?? 4. How do you do it Linkster?? 5. I want bill to come here and offer his opinion ![]()
__________________
Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|