|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Took the hint.
|
"get full length videos click here" is blinder that Stevie Wonder.
The site is about as generic as a no-name tomato paste. I see a dozen or more sites like this every day, and I decline more and more of them for having the same boring, white bread template, fonts, layouts, etc... Think outside the box! Alex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance
|
Like Alex said it is pretty bland, I'm no graphics guru so I don't impose that on anyone. But some well placed text and better colors go a long way. In addition there are a 100's of different ways to layout your pages.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lord help me, I'm just not that bright
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 101
|
Right. I'm aware of the blandness of it and it's not a site I would actually submit as it is. My main questions are about the directory structures, recip links and such. The graphics, colors, text, etc would all be different. (I do want to make money, lol)
So, do I have the right number of links out and such? Would 6 recips on an index.html page mirrored in 8 subdirectories be ok, since everyone gets an index page recip that way? Could I use amateur as a category when there is no webcam category present? I'm pretty sure I have the right idea, but I don't want to make a good looking site and then submit it only to find I have to scrap the whole thing because no one liked the recips or some other rules oriented thing. Thanks again for the time to help out here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Welcome Odysseus
![]() Your site structure looks fine. Yea, the site could use some excitement...but I'm sure you'll fix that up. You do have some blind links in there...those will cost you listings. Here's a good thread on the subject; http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ht=blind+links Again, welcome and good luck to ya ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lord help me, I'm just not that bright
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 101
|
Thanks Mr Yum. That helps alot. I wasn't really worried about blind links because I never intend to use them in free sites or TGP galleries. However, after reading that thread I see there is a fine line that I probably would have strayed closer to than I would intend. I'll bust out another go at this page with some better design that is more indicative of what I intend to be submitting so that I can get some input on some of my other, non design related questions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Glad to help Odysseus
![]() Blind links have been getting worse lately, which is no doubt why Max started that thread. I think it's added clarity for a lot of free site builders. Yep, that's the best way...keep tweaking and re-posting for suggestions. That should definitely help get you off on the right foot ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
My wife is not a doobie to be passed around! On our wedding day I promised to bogart her for life!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 272
|
Personally I don't have a problem with the "blandness" of your site at all. I could care less what colors you use, as long as it looks fairly clean (and it does).
I am more concerned about whether or not the content is of good quality. Surfers want to see some good pics and you have good photos there. As far as the links as concerned, unless there are free full length movies waiting on the other side ( and I doubt that there are) the links are blind. Which makes it an unlistable site. Actually, I can't even say for sure they are blind because when I click them I get a 404. Other than that...I would list it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|