Deletion from DMOZ - enemies in action?

[DangerDave]

Lets get something straight.. there is no "situation" to be resolved

Just because Kit thinks his site belongs in DMOZ - does not make it a fact or certainty.

How to suggest a site to the Open Directory
http://dmoz.org/add.html

Please recognize that making the ODP a useful resource requires us to exercise broad editorial discretion in determining the content and structure of the directory. That discretion extends (but is not limited) to what sites to include, where in the directory sites are placed, whether and when to include more than one link to a site, when deep linking is appropriate, and the content of the title and description of the site. In addition, a site's placement in the directory is subject to change or deletion at any time at our sole discretion. You should not rely on any aspect of a site's inclusion in the directory. Please understand that an editor's exercise of discretion may not always treat all submissions equally. You may not always agree with our choices, but we hope you recognize that we do our best to make fair and reasonable decisions.

Originally Posted by DocHolly

I really think the "editors" are just arbitrary in their listings and 'de-listings' because I’ve found most times they make no sense.

Sorry Doc, but that is not true... There is ALWAYS lengthy discussion on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for all types of sites, be they adult or non-adult.

Originally Posted by sleeper

The editors usually build the same type of sites that are listed in their categories.

Another completely unfounded sweeping generalisation - so often extolled by people that have never been a DMOZ editor.

Originally Posted by sleeper

You can submit sites to DMOZ and not have it reviewed for years. You're lucky to get anything listed if you're not a editor or don't know a editor.

More unfounded bullshit... - again an opinion so often extolled by people that have never been a DMOZ editor.

Originally Posted by sleeper

On second thought I submitted a noncommercial site and it was listed promptly within a month.

Good to see you are disproving your own generalisations.

Originally Posted by Kit

I think it may be truth :-(
One my friend show me this domain:
http://www.whois.sc/dmoz/FREE-SEX-PI...E-SEX-PICS.COM
It's a clear spam of DMOZ directory, but it's a "right" spam from "right" person (I think so).

There IS still spammy stuff in DMOZ.. without question... AND the present Adult editors work most days to rid DMOZ of crap like that.. Dont blame current editors for the system they inherited.

Originally Posted by Kit

I found the reason. One of the DMOZ editors helped me. The editor, who deleted my site, is named Jezebel.

- Nice one Kit... care to let us know who the editor was that gave you that privileged information.?

Originally Posted by Kit

So the deletion turned out to be a result of my request to restore PenisBot.com in DMOZ listing. 4 Years ago, it has been deleted and blacklisted due to some multi-posting issue. We made AVS sites for multiple AVS-systems and submitted them to related AVS categories. I think I atoned my guilt long time ago.

Don't let facts get in the way of a good story Kit...

Originally Posted by sleeper

You're getting shafted

.. and what would you base that opinion on? blind assumption and speculation?

Originally Posted by sleeper

You shouldn't have site "B" deleted because you made a mistake with site "A" some years back.

Pissed off or not DMOZ editors aren't suppose to treat the directories like their own personal link list

You're not suppose to become a editor just to list your own shit and to maintan a edge over your competition..

But let's face the facts - why else would anybody do it?

More unsupported generalisations and assumptions based on board roumours..

Site deletions or additions are subject to change or deletion at any time at our sole discretion. This is the guidelines that you agree to at the time of submission!

Lets face facts... you have no idea what you are talking about.

Originally Posted by sleeper

Google needs to stop using DMOZ.

Why? because you said so? I think you credit yourse3lf with too much influence


DD

[kenny]

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Lets get something straight.. there is no "situation" to be resolved

Just because Kit thinks his site belongs in DMOZ - does not make it a fact or certainty.

That site is probably one of the best review sites in the adult Industry - I think it should be rather OBVIOUS that it belongs there.

In fact I think the site in question is Superior to any of the sites currently listed in that directory.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

How to suggest a site to the Open Directory
http://dmoz.org/add.html

Yes - that is exactly how it's suppose to be..

You mean to tell me you actually think that webmasters volunteer to edit that shit out of the kindness of their hearts?

Please..

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Another completely unfounded sweeping generalisation - so often extolled by people that have never been a DMOZ editor.

Run a whois spider through the directories and tell me you won't find multiple sites listed that belong to DMOZ editors under the very directories that they edit.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

More unfounded bullshit... - again an opinion so often extolled by people that have never been a DMOZ editor.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out - if you think these acquisitions are incorrect then you're probably in the minority.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Good to see you are disproving your own generalisations.

I never said all editors were corrupt - besides it's kind of hard to capitalize in a non profit directory.

I'm simply implying the level of corruption increases inside the directories when there is more to be gained.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

There IS still spammy stuff in DMOZ.. without question... AND the present Adult editors work most days to rid DMOZ of crap like that.. Dont blame current editors for the system they inherited.

Probably alot of it belongs to the old editors - lol

Seriously though most of the adult webmasters who apply for that volunteer job do it for their own personal advantage. There is really nothing else to be gained.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

.. and what would you base that opinion on? blind assumption and speculation?

You mean besides the obvious nature of it?

Basicly I put two and two together - I've seen BS like this happen dozens of times in DMOZ. This is by no means a isolated incident.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

More unsupported generalisations and assumptions based on board roumours..

In your prespective

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Site deletions or additions are subject to change or deletion at any time at our sole discretion. This is the guidelines that you agree to at the time of submission!

Yes - their discretion being largely for personal gain.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Lets face facts... you have no idea what you are talking about.

You're mistaken if that is what you think.

You're trying to tell me that there is no corruption in DMOZ..

The notion of that is utterly ridiculous

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Why? because you said so? I think you credit yourse3lf with too much influence

DD

Because it's a dinosaur. It takes years to review sites.

It no longer serves a purpose with the exception of boosting a search engine rank