Why not .KID instead of .XXX?

SirMoby · 2005-12-09, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

I think that .XXX can be seen as "doing something about evil dirty pornographers", which is politically a good thing, where as .KID would be a nice gesture that wouldn't stir up the same emotion.

You have to remember that objective here isn't to protect children, it is to set us on a path to follow the righteous teaching of the christian lord. They want to remake the world to match their teaching.

Alex

I know the objective as it's very clear and I think you know that I'm smart enough to know this.

What would happen if a reasonable proposal was actually put together and instead of everyone shooting things down we actually created a positive alternative?

Surfn · 2005-12-09, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirMoby

I know the objective as it's very clear and I think you know that I'm smart enough to know this.

What would happen if a reasonable proposal was actually put together and instead of everyone shooting things down we actually created a positive alternative?

I wasn't shooting you down. I think .kid would be great on it's own channel to. My remark about the blood sucking lawyers is also true.

Linkster · 2005-12-09, 06:14 AM

The .kids domain was sent up to ICANN and was shot down although congress actually passed a bill adopting it and supporting it. ICANN's problem with it was who designates what is kid-safe around the world? And since that question has never been answered the domain tld just sits there all set to go.

That said I dont think the adult industry should be the ones leading the charge for either domain changes - although my personal belief is that I would support a .kids domain fully - there would always be a stigma that would relate the actions and that is not the stigma we want.

And of course now we all know why the .xxx is being supported so fully by adult organizations for their own profit and stature so with the combination of adult WMs against it (I hope) and the administration against it for right-wing reasons it should never see the light of day again

Wazza · 2005-12-09, 06:33 AM

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2417:

I think Moby makes a good point - this issue is definately worth revisiting

http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...58&postcount=4

I'm sure with such a levy on all "other" domains you could put together a pretty good panel to review the content

Further - I think you could have a series of .u domains - .u18, .u17 and so on - and a compatible browser which only allows access to the appropriate extension

kidsfundomain might have a u16 domain and a u10 domain - each with content deemed appropriate by this panel

With proper administration this could work quite well...

2005-12-09, 06:14 AM	#3
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	The .kids domain was sent up to ICANN and was shot down although congress actually passed a bill adopting it and supporting it. ICANN's problem with it was who designates what is kid-safe around the world? And since that question has never been answered the domain tld just sits there all set to go. That said I dont think the adult industry should be the ones leading the charge for either domain changes - although my personal belief is that I would support a .kids domain fully - there would always be a stigma that would relate the actions and that is not the stigma we want. And of course now we all know why the .xxx is being supported so fully by adult organizations for their own profit and stature so with the combination of adult WMs against it (I hope) and the administration against it for right-wing reasons it should never see the light of day again __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-12-09, 06:33 AM	#4
Wazza I'm a jaded evil bastard, I wouldn't piss on myself if I was on fire... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 808	http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2417: I think Moby makes a good point - this issue is definately worth revisiting http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...58&postcount=4 I'm sure with such a levy on all "other" domains you could put together a pretty good panel to review the content Further - I think you could have a series of .u domains - .u18, .u17 and so on - and a compatible browser which only allows access to the appropriate extension kidsfundomain might have a u16 domain and a u10 domain - each with content deemed appropriate by this panel With proper administration this could work quite well... __________________ I sale Internet My sites have no traffic and no PR - let's trade - PM me