Why not .KID instead of .XXX?

MadMax · 2005-12-09, 05:58 PM

To echo the sentiments on .kid, it makes far too much sense. As far as "who would determine what is and is not appropriate", that is exactly what fees for the domain could go to pay for. Companies that genuinely marked products to kids for kids shouldn't have any problem ponying up some decent cash for the domain names, and let a regulatory body be paid for by the fees.

gobgook2 · 2005-12-10, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadMax

To echo the sentiments on .kid, it makes far too much sense. As far as "who would determine what is and is not appropriate", that is exactly what fees for the domain could go to pay for. Companies that genuinely marked products to kids for kids shouldn't have any problem ponying up some decent cash for the domain names, and let a regulatory body be paid for by the fees.

If the best argument is "who will determine what belongs on .kid", then throw back the same... "who determines what gets put on .xxx? Are we going to to have a RAT SQUAD paid by tax dollars that do nothing but surf .com, .net, .org domains for porn, so they can be moved into the new red light .xxx district? Do non-nude membership sites constitue "Adult" and therefore .xxx? Tit for Tat. They're all too busy getting saved to see reality...

Praise Jesus!

2005-12-09, 05:58 PM	#1
MadMax "Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes" ~ Satan Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Motor City, baby, where carjacking was invented! Now GIMME THOSE SHOES! Posts: 2,385	To echo the sentiments on .kid, it makes far too much sense. As far as "who would determine what is and is not appropriate", that is exactly what fees for the domain could go to pay for. Companies that genuinely marked products to kids for kids shouldn't have any problem ponying up some decent cash for the domain names, and let a regulatory body be paid for by the fees.