What to do about changes in the Live Chat content market?!

[Wizzo]

1 good point, the other not so much... I agree that it gets the surfer closer to making a impulse 1click sale and understand that.

But using a CC as a source of age verification has already been ruled as a inadequate means of age verification by a number of courts. So you are no less legally protected. Just as a example my 10 year old daughter has Visa debit card in her name attached to her savings account and certain there's millions of other minors that now have the same.

[guestcam]

Originally Posted by Wizzo

1 good point, the other not so much... I agree that it gets the surfer closer to making a impulse 1click sale and understand that.

But using a CC as a source of age verification has already been ruled as a inadequate means of age verification by a number of courts. So you are no less legally protected. Just as a example my 10 year old daughter has Visa debit card in her name attached to her savings account and certain there's millions of other minors that now have the same.

well in these days of pussified DNC leadership and running scared media orgs, yeah I suppose NO ONE not doing gop's, I mean god's bidding, can be no less legally protected (by what use to be called your civil rights).

I am kinda ignorant on the specifics of these court cases you refer to; are any of them federal courts?

as to the debit visa cards - I had the impression our processors can tell which are true visa credit and which are debit cards. Arent debit cards rejected as a source not only for age reasons but because of rebill reasons as well?

IN any case, as someone said, numbers dont lie. Maybe I need more and or different traffic and then the 'easier access to live chat means more one on one upsells' theory will come into play. But right now, its the 'two many steps and a wallet to go fetch' theory that seems to be working against me at the moment.

Harry
PS: Thanks to you all for the rebirth in interest in the topic