|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: What internet content label do you think should be the standard and promoted as such? | |||
ICRA label (or another existing system) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 10.67% |
A simple <content="adult"> meta tag |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
45 | 60.00% |
A more complex tag with varying content levels but still one that is just inserted in the html (much like current TV or MPA ratings) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 14.67% |
A meta label combined with V-chip type system |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 6.67% |
No label |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 8.00% |
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Took the hint.
|
At the end of the day Moby, the idea is to keep children away from adult things. "adult hate" and "adult drugs" and "adult pony rides" are all adult. If you are over 18, you can drink, you can die in a war, you can look at hate material, and you can enjoy porn.
Adult is adult is adult, I think. The idea is everyone has to label. Not just adult sites... ALL sites. If you have a website, you have to label, the same way all TV shows have to rate, even if they are childrens shows. It isn't to great a ghetto of adult sites and nothing else. If you don't do this sort of thing, people will just build adult sites without the rating and say "fuck it". Everyone has to forced in, and then it is all good. Alex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
Think past this arguement and onto the stage of pushing it through congress. Why shouldn't they simply say that "Adult" is only about sexual material? If they do then it makes for a great news story, keeps them from ever having to label their own sites and gets the support of voters. Stop arguing with me on the issue of all sites. It's a waste of energy since we both agree. Please start thinking about the politicians, the media and Hollywood. They will all push for the rating system to only be used for sexual material so none of them have to label anything. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Lord help me, I'm just not that bright
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Still, I'm not arguing with you, I don't like things being dumbed down. For instance, I don't think wearing seatbelts should be a law. And I also think that your insurance company shouldn't be responsible for injuries received from not wearing one. Same goes for motorcyle helmets, but that's just an example. I'm big on accountability for ones self, and for those you are responsible for. So, we are on the same page, to a degree. But, as Sir Moby and Raw Alex are pointing out, the political nonsense that would surround establishing a standard is mind boggling. Considering the political climate in the US right now, nothing seems simple, straight forward, and sensible. It's very frustrating.
__________________
Eric |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|