Greenguy Stats Run - What Would You Like To See, Skippy?

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by nekrom

Imo Option 1 mate.
It would show more program diversification than option 2. -N

I don't see how #1 would be more diverse, seeings how in option #1 there would be 0=none revshare sites.


That eliminates a lot of good sites, mine included

[MrYum]

I think option 2 gives a bigger overall picture

How tough would it be to add rev/click to that run?

I try to ignore ratios these days...$/click seems to be more relevant.

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by MrYum

I think option 2 gives a bigger overall picture

How tough would it be to add rev/click to that run?

I try to ignore ratios these days...$/click seems to be more relevant.

A little tougher for the revshare model but I've seen it done, just divide your monthly revenue from sponsor by monthly uniques clicks = rev/click. With a good revshare program this rev/click number should climb each month without increasing traffic due to your rebills accumulating.

A larger problem I think might be programs that don't count first page uniques. These will not show correct in comparison to programs that do show 1st page, so you'd need to count your own clicks or something there.

[nekrom]

Originally Posted by [BV]

I don't see how... (sic)

Ya I left out the "from a pps program perspective". Option 2 would show less programs then option 1, but on the other hand 1 would show no revshare programs.

Idealy option 3 would be best but would be a crunt to compile.

-N

[Seba]

First option is cool for me