DMOZ supports Child Porn?

kit · 2006-02-21, 09:17 AM

There is couple interesting threads regarding child porn inside of DMOZ:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...highlight=dmoz

http://blog.psychlinks.ca/2006/02/ao...tes.html#links

Any coments?

Greenguy · 2006-02-21, 09:24 AM

My comment is that you're an ass for bringing this up.

The site mentioned in that 1st one clearly has a 2257 statement & while some of the words used are not the best of choices, the site is probably legal.

Based on this thinking, any site that uses the word "boy" of "girl" is CP?

http://www.penisbot.com/search.html?search=boy&where=

You have some links to remove.

kit · 2006-02-21, 07:09 PM

No, I'm not about the "boy/girl" terms, I just read this:

"The thread discusses the listing in certain DMOZ categories of websites which promote child pornography and pedophilia via pro-pedophilia forums and chat rooms"
http://blog.psychlinks.ca/2006/02/ao...tes.html#links

"A collection of Haley's stories. Includes original fiction, non-fiction and fan-fiction. Stories feature the non-consensual or semi-consensual spanking of late preteens and early/late teenagers."
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showp...25&postcount=3

"I am absolutely appalled by the description of some of the sites listed in Adult/Arts/Online_Writing/Fiction/BDSM/Spanking/Free/ especially the fact that one of them is "cooled" i.e. deemed the most comprehensive/definitive on the subject matter, is said to include child spanking stories"
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showp...5&postcount=30

"Just scouting around for real evidence: if you want something to get worked up about try

Adult/Computers/Internet/Chats_and_Forums/Activities_and_Practices/Pedophilia/Affirmative_Views/
That is carrying freedom of speech just too far. I am just so glad I am no longer an editor, my blood would have boiled at the thought of being in the same organization as people who would create such a category and list such sites."
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showp...2&postcount=80

.....

And I ask GG&J forum opinion

Bill · 2006-02-21, 07:41 PM

The people at the digitalpoints forum seem to have a gross misunderstanding of how the dmoz adult images area works - they are complaining that a domain has many entries, calling them doorways - but as we all know, each of those supposed doorways is actually a simple and traditional dmoz images site of the sort that has been being listed there for many years.

I'm not going to read 51 pages of bitching but so far I don't see any real evidence of cp.

Story sites have always gotten away with murder in that area.

kit · 2006-02-21, 08:18 PM

I agree, too many dumb posts there, but some factsis more than serious, for example the Adult/Computers/Internet/Chats_and_Forums/Activities_and_Practices/Pedophilia/Affirmative_Views/ category and its content:

Quote:

# BLISS: BoyLove International Support Society - Forum and support group for boy lovers. Collection of boy love stories.
# BoyChat - Online discussion forum for boy lovers.
# Closencounters Digest - An archive of the best threads which appeared on the now-defunct Close Encounters forum, a message board primarily for child lovers.
# Girl Chat - Discussion forum for girl lovers.
# Lifeline - Real-time chat server for minor-attracted adults considering suicide.

Sorry guys for quoting this shit, but I can't belive in fact that DMOZ editors collect this links in good feelings.

GonZo · 2006-02-21, 11:41 PM

This the same Kit I know?

SirMoby · 2006-02-22, 12:29 AM

It's unfortunate that DMOZ is still used for anything

MeatPounder · 2006-02-22, 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonZo

This the same Kit I know?

I was thinking the same

Greenguy · 2006-02-22, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

...I'm not going to read 51 pages of bitching but so far I don't see any real evidence of cp.

Story sites have always gotten away with murder in that area.

I'm with you. Like I have time to read thru all this crap from some boards I've never heard of.

As shitty as it might be, this seems to be all text/stories & that's covered by freedom of speech as far as I know.

Jim · 2006-02-22, 08:34 AM

Stories, that's what we are talking about here? What the fuck??? Some of the best books in literature involve incest, rape, torture and having sex with underage children. Even movies are the same. And that is just by the great author, John Irving. Who brough us such great novles as "The World According to Garp" (Underage Sex), "The Hotel New Hampshire" (Insest), and my latest read, "A Widow For One Year" (Again, Underage Sex). All three are also movies. Don't watch "A Door In The Floor" if you don't want to be offended by underage sex.

This entire conversation seems pointless.

Agent · 2006-02-22, 06:31 PM

Under Part V of the Canadian Criminal Code this sort of text material is declared CP. With that said the courts have never upheld this part of the Act as far as I know and many people would like to have it changed for the reasons Jim stated above. By its wording Romero and Juliet should become illegal material.

2006-02-21, 09:17 AM	#1
kit Do you want the job done right, or do you want it done fast? Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 494	DMOZ supports Child Porn? There is couple interesting threads regarding child porn inside of DMOZ: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...highlight=dmoz http://blog.psychlinks.ca/2006/02/ao...tes.html#links Any coments? __________________ PornInspector.com

2006-02-21, 09:24 AM	#2
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,929	My comment is that you're an ass for bringing this up. The site mentioned in that 1st one clearly has a 2257 statement & while some of the words used are not the best of choices, the site is probably legal. Based on this thinking, any site that uses the word "boy" of "girl" is CP? http://www.penisbot.com/search.html?search=boy&where= You have some links to remove. __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2006-02-21, 07:09 PM	#3
kit Do you want the job done right, or do you want it done fast? Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 494	No, I'm not about the "boy/girl" terms, I just read this: "The thread discusses the listing in certain DMOZ categories of websites which promote child pornography and pedophilia via pro-pedophilia forums and chat rooms" http://blog.psychlinks.ca/2006/02/ao...tes.html#links "A collection of Haley's stories. Includes original fiction, non-fiction and fan-fiction. Stories feature the non-consensual or semi-consensual spanking of late preteens and early/late teenagers." http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showp...25&postcount=3 "I am absolutely appalled by the description of some of the sites listed in Adult/Arts/Online_Writing/Fiction/BDSM/Spanking/Free/ especially the fact that one of them is "cooled" i.e. deemed the most comprehensive/definitive on the subject matter, is said to include child spanking stories" http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showp...5&postcount=30 "Just scouting around for real evidence: if you want something to get worked up about try Adult/Computers/Internet/Chats_and_Forums/Activities_and_Practices/Pedophilia/Affirmative_Views/ That is carrying freedom of speech just too far. I am just so glad I am no longer an editor, my blood would have boiled at the thought of being in the same organization as people who would create such a category and list such sites." http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showp...2&postcount=80 ..... And I ask GG&J forum opinion __________________ PornInspector.com

2006-02-22, 06:31 PM	#11
Agent You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 631	Under Part V of the Canadian Criminal Code this sort of text material is declared CP. With that said the courts have never upheld this part of the Act as far as I know and many people would like to have it changed for the reasons Jim stated above. By its wording Romero and Juliet should become illegal material. __________________ Brihana.com

2006-02-21, 07:41 PM	#4
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	The people at the digitalpoints forum seem to have a gross misunderstanding of how the dmoz adult images area works - they are complaining that a domain has many entries, calling them doorways - but as we all know, each of those supposed doorways is actually a simple and traditional dmoz images site of the sort that has been being listed there for many years. I'm not going to read 51 pages of bitching but so far I don't see any real evidence of cp. Story sites have always gotten away with murder in that area.

2006-02-21, 11:41 PM	#6
GonZo You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Atlanta,Ga Posts: 893	This the same Kit I know?

2006-02-22, 12:29 AM	#7
SirMoby Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 2,706	It's unfortunate that DMOZ is still used for anything

2006-02-22, 08:34 AM	#10
Jim Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York Posts: 19,477	Stories, that's what we are talking about here? What the fuck??? Some of the best books in literature involve incest, rape, torture and having sex with underage children. Even movies are the same. And that is just by the great author, John Irving. Who brough us such great novles as "The World According to Garp" (Underage Sex), "The Hotel New Hampshire" (Insest), and my latest read, "A Widow For One Year" (Again, Underage Sex). All three are also movies. Don't watch "A Door In The Floor" if you don't want to be offended by underage sex. This entire conversation seems pointless.