Would you decline for this?

ladydesigner · 2006-02-23, 07:01 AM

hmmmm...... for me, being both a free site builder and a ll owner I always put a text link on gallery pages like #2 that goes to a matching niche page on one of my link lists. When the surfer clicks it, the page has sponsor sites listed first with the free sites listed under those. I don't think there's anything deceptive about that. You've said "more lesbian links" and that's what the surfer gets. Because I do this, I don't have any problem with other link list owners doing the same on the free sites they submit to me.

Lemmy · 2006-02-23, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladydesigner

hmmmm...... for me, being both a free site builder and a ll owner I always put a text link on gallery pages like #2 that goes to a matching niche page on one of my link lists. When the surfer clicks it, the page has sponsor sites listed first with the free sites listed under those. I don't think there's anything deceptive about that. You've said "more lesbian links" and that's what the surfer gets. Because I do this, I don't have any problem with other link list owners doing the same on the free sites they submit to me.

I don't have a problem with what you describe herel, in fact I do it myself. I checked out you Amateur cat at Click4SexFun and you have 27 clearly marked paysites at the top followed by over 200 free listings. No problem at all.

My beef is with the kind of page that has a lot of huge paysite links (that aren't even identified as such) followed by a tiny "continue-to-freesites" type link.

What Ramster says makes sense; the cumulative impression of the entire site. If I feel they're trying to bullshit the surfer it's thumbs down.

glowlite · 2006-02-23, 09:11 PM

I agree with NetGoonie on both counts.

I can't think why any LL would jepordize their reputation with surfers by listing freesites with 'questionable' intentions. Why take the risk? Even if it's remote? It's the 'guilt by association' thing.

As a new submiter I've encountered many LLs using semi-deceptive links for their own benefit. Regardless of their reputation and traffic potential they will never be in my recip tables. Once again, it's the 'guilt by association' thing.

later ....................

2006-02-23, 07:01 AM	#1
ladydesigner ~Serving Up Sinful Sex ~ Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Missouri City, Texas Posts: 1,928	hmmmm...... for me, being both a free site builder and a ll owner I always put a text link on gallery pages like #2 that goes to a matching niche page on one of my link lists. When the surfer clicks it, the page has sponsor sites listed first with the free sites listed under those. I don't think there's anything deceptive about that. You've said "more lesbian links" and that's what the surfer gets. Because I do this, I don't have any problem with other link list owners doing the same on the free sites they submit to me. __________________ Porn Pixie XxX ~ Looking for Link Trades

2006-02-23, 09:11 PM	#3
glowlite Banned Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: ARIZONA - INDIANA Posts: 101	I agree with NetGoonie on both counts. I can't think why any LL would jepordize their reputation with surfers by listing freesites with 'questionable' intentions. Why take the risk? Even if it's remote? It's the 'guilt by association' thing. As a new submiter I've encountered many LLs using semi-deceptive links for their own benefit. Regardless of their reputation and traffic potential they will never be in my recip tables. Once again, it's the 'guilt by association' thing. later ....................