Warning page

[Jel]

Interesting thread

How does any surfer arrive at your warning page? For freesites it's through a link from a porn site, or a link from a search engine whereby the surfer has searched for porn. I'd be amazed if anyone is getting traffic from a SE to a freesite using non-adult searches, unless they were specifically aiming to trick people that are searching for knitting patterns into clicking a porn link - not exactly a productive use of one's time.

[glowlite]

You're exactly right jel. If someone SEO's there little 4 page FS correctly there is basically no SE fodder on the index. If anything, the gallery and/or main page will pull the SERP's completely skirting the index/warning page.

And yes, if the page is stuffed with irrelevant content/keywords the whole search is skewed.

Cheaters abound .............

[glowlite]

By the way MrYum, Yeah, that site you listed was SEO'd to the max and designed for the 'Big 3' Link Lists (YaHoo-Google-MSN Search) But, reason is, everything we do is aimed at long-term residual income.

I never hear that mentioned in FS dialogue. As a matter of fact many of the freesites I come across in old threads are gone in 3-4-5 months.404

So are many of the new WMs gone, it seems to be a 'swinging door' in the adult arena, by that I mean new players nearly everyday. Not only are so many new to adult but new to internet marketing period.

later .........

[wishmaster]

thank's for ever one thought's ...
glade i'm not the only one that thinks this way about this matter


some time i read a-lt want to put my input in but i just keep it to myself lol as in sure many of us do ...
welll thanks agina
alll of you for your input on this matter

later wishmaster

[lassiter]

Originally Posted by Jel

I'd be amazed if anyone is getting traffic from a SE to a freesite using non-adult searches, unless they were specifically aiming to trick people that are searching for knitting patterns into clicking a porn link - not exactly a productive use of one's time.

Well, this brings up the elephant in the room that anti-porner "protect the children" types either ignore or deliberately confuse.

There is a major difference between 1.) an 8-year-old searching Yahoo for "Barbie" or "Cinderella" that get hit with a faceful of cumshot images, and 2.) a 16-year-old boy who is actively searching for porn images.

The first group should have legitimate protections in place, such as parental filters, non-explicit warning pages, etc. The latter group - well, that's the immutable law of supply and demand, and the idea that someone needs protection from something that they are already knowledgeable enough to be actively seeking out is laughable.

Of course the anti-porners bring up the first example when what they really want to do is stop their horny teenagers from finding jerkoff material. I agree we have a responsibility to do what we can to discourage the teens, if for no other reason then the fact that they are non-paying bandwidth wasters. But we all know a "warning page" isn't gonna stop the teen boy horndogs.