|
|
View Poll Results: vote for all that apply to how you obtain your content | |||
0% purchased 100% sponsor | 4 | 9.30% | |
20% purchased 80%sponsor | 11 | 25.58% | |
40% purchased 60% sponsor | 9 | 20.93% | |
80% purchased 20% sponsor | 9 | 20.93% | |
100% purchased 0% sponsor | 12 | 27.91% | |
Exclusive | 5 | 11.63% | |
Semi-exclusive | 4 | 9.30% | |
I shoot my own | 6 | 13.95% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
2006-03-05, 05:06 AM | #51 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Setting content aside that was only for sponsors only and had a license to allow them to give it to affiliates and FHGs would be a solution.
So a set is worth $500, which 5 sponsors will give me $100 each for a limited license? I think it's one of those things that works in theory but not practise. |
2006-03-05, 05:14 AM | #52 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-03-05, 06:36 AM | #53 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Would be nice to hear from sponsors as well as us throwing ideas at each other. |
|
2006-03-05, 06:42 AM | #54 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-03-06, 12:08 AM | #55 |
Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!
|
tia, thanks. btw, i love "Since I started in the content business at the turn of the century.."
why limit the sponsor license to 5 or even 10? i'm not really sure it has to be limited at all as lots of sponsors happily give out the most overused content on the web. if they want it limited, let them pay more. if they don't care, let them pay less. i'll try and think of some smaller programs to send to this thread. i used to buy affiliate content from anyone who would sell me a license - and i nagged one guy to death. but since i'm not shooting my own stuff, i'm not really in the running anymore. |
2006-03-06, 01:17 AM | #56 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-03-06, 03:57 AM | #57 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
I think that may be the whole problem right there. Free content doesn't have as much value to sponsors as it does to the content producers. So what sponsors are using for promotion is something they value very little.. throwing enough garbage against the wall hoping some of it will stick (borrowed that from you Paul ) My theory of selling was always to put your best foot forward, it doesn't make sense to promote something with less than the best of what you have... or does it? I'm still anxious to hear what sponsors have to say about this subject, it should be interesting |
|
2006-03-06, 09:14 AM | #58 | |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-03-06, 09:17 AM | #59 | |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-03-06, 12:48 PM | #60 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|