|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Internet! Is that thing still around?
|
Thanks for the input Alex,
Only problem is our pix are opening in a window with slide show etc.. which means IE wont resize image... (or my ie doesn't anyway) Looking forward to seeing what other peoples thoughts are on this.... I guess its do members want to see detail and slide the image if necessary or sit back and ogle(one hand mouse operation) at the whole image. :o) HB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would say the bigger the better.
On our paysite they can choose the size of images they want to see, with the slide show or normal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
600 long side is bottom of the barrel. 2000x1333 would be above average, but a few sites offer even bigger pics. Blowing up pics just to make them look bigger is a no-no though. Clarity over high-res.
Your slideshow script/html should be flexible. You can offer medium rez pics for slideshows and high rez for download but I think if you code the page to adjust to the photo width you'd have no problems. I prefer ZIP downloads. That way I can use a photo browsing proggie to view the photos offline. That means full screen viewing, no waiting for individual big pics to download.
__________________
Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|