Greenguy's Board WebcamWiz CRAZY $5,000 Reward Bonuses


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > Products and/or Services Offered
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2006-04-19, 08:16 AM   #1
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,929
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
First, you do a lot better and more thorough job on your stats than I. As far as the mixing goes, I think it is a totally smart thing to do in some instances. Take a program like Bangbros that has ome older sites with a shit-ton of episodes. I find those work out better Revshare ON THE OLDER SITES with more content...there is so much there the people stay forever. For the newer Bangbros sites I just run with the PPS becasue they doon't have a good of a retention. When the two are "blended" it makes for some nice sized checks showing up.

I would love to have the time to break down everything as you said, but these stats are not the bible. If you are submitting free sites to me...they are of use to webmasters becasue they know what is converting. I wish revstats still worked so I could drill down to single sites more than Statsremote does....
Bang Bros stats interface is HORRIBLE for anyone that's looking at their stats & wondering what their per click numbers are because you can't separate the PPS totals from the revshare totals. I'm probably going to leave them off any upcoming stats runs that I do because of this. But can you see how even just one trial sale for $2.47 would throw off your per click numbers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
Ok, say with moneycashmegabankmoneybucksbing I did 30 sales over a nine month period. Say 15 were 5$ trials and didn't rebill (37.50)$. That would be $37.50 on those initials. Then say 15 went to full joins ($225) and then of those 15 that 10 went to retain for an average of 3 months ($15 x 3 x 10 = $450). So we have $37.50 off the batch of crappy trial hoppers, $225 from the initials, and $450 from the rebills for a total of base number of $712.5....then you divide that by the number of initials (30) and you arrive at $23.75. Then you divide the $23.75 by the number of hits it took to make that sale and you have a value per click. So, in this case you would be better off taking a PPS for $30 if everything converted the same, but say that the revshare coverted 50% well as the PPS (mind you, this is all hypothical)...then you would make $35.62 on the same number of outgoing hits. The conversion ratio factors heavily into this....
Ok - now that makes sense! You threw me with the "...and factored in the # of months so I had an average number to work with..." statement since you didn't say how the months were factored in. This makes complete sense

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
I used statsremote to figure that one out. I will have to investigate further. Thanks for the 411.
That would make sense. I don't use a stats program anymore, but I assume that State Remote does keep the totals for the previous month so I apologize for this comment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
If my list is useless, it is no more useless than yours, hoes.com, onprobation or anyone else that post stats.
Aside from the 1st few months back in 2002, I have tried my best to not mix & match the PPS & revshare totals (1st revshare totals that I've posted in the last 4 years came out last month)

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
Yes, I have taken time to try to factor these things, but it is not as simple as "this guy counts first" and "this guy counts second", some programs don't show hits from counrties they can't bill for, so programs don't display hits from certians IPs ect, some programs just plain shave...I could make a career out of just studying that shit if I wanted, but I'd rather not.
I agree it's not an exact science, but you know that some of those programs count 1st & some of them count 2nd & you can easily sort them out that way instead of ranking them by the per click totals which are off because they are not based on the same factors. A 2nd page program might come in at 8 cents a click & a 1st page program comes in a 5 cents, but if the 1st page clicks were known for the 2nd page program, they might be at 3 or 4 cents a click & thus, worse than the 5 cent 1st page program. Make sense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
I am in beta with some new software (Captianstats) that is a desk based program that can equalize the numbers automaticly based on what is known about the programs hit counting (and no, it isn't my software) -- there were still bugs in it when I published these stats, so I couldn't use it. Anyone can hit me up if they want to try a beta copy (it's free) - I'll put you in touch with the guys that are coding it.
Of course I'm interested in something like that

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
I make sales. Checks show up. I know the numbers are badly skewed, but it's the money that matters at the end of the day.
The just post everyone in alphabetical order so that you're not leading people to believe that the ranking are accurate - that's really all I'm saying in this
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-04-19, 05:27 PM   #2
xxxjay
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
xxxjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,787
Send a message via ICQ to xxxjay Send a message via AIM to xxxjay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
Bang Bros stats interface is HORRIBLE for anyone that's looking at their stats & wondering what their per click numbers are because you can't separate the PPS totals from the revshare totals. I'm probably going to leave them off any upcoming stats runs that I do because of this. But can you see how even just one trial sale for $2.47 would throw off your per click numbers?
True, their stats are not the best. That's why I opted for the longer time period instead of just one month (9 months)....then I just took the total amout of money in and divided it by the numbers of sales. As far as mixing the rev and the PPS...I can see where tracking it can be a pain, but there is something nice about a nice base of PPS with rebills coming in on top. Then you don't go "dry" on a bad month.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
Ok - now that makes sense! You threw me with the "...and factored in the # of months so I had an average number to work with..." statement since you didn't say how the months were factored in. This makes complete sense
Thanks, I should have explained it better the first time. I blame my fear of calculators.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
That would make sense. I don't use a stats program anymore, but I assume that State Remote does keep the totals for the previous month so I apologize for this comment.
I was a bigger fan Revstats. You don't do everything by hand now...do you? That's alot of work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
Aside from the 1st few months back in 2002, I have tried my best to not mix & match the PPS & revshare totals (1st revshare totals that I've posted in the last 4 years came out last month)
That cool. I don't really worry about trials, no trials, revshare, or pps...its mostly about whatever convert and whatever earns...which is all that really matters at the end of the day anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
I agree it's not an exact science, but you know that some of those programs count 1st & some of them count 2nd & you can easily sort them out that way instead of ranking them by the per click totals which are off because they are not based on the same factors. A 2nd page program might come in at 8 cents a click & a 1st page program comes in a 5 cents, but if the 1st page clicks were known for the 2nd page program, they might be at 3 or 4 cents a click & thus, worse than the 5 cent 1st page program. Make sense?
You know...there really should be some kind of regulation of all this shit. Even though I would hate to see the goverment do it. It would be like if you went to the market and bought steak...they don't have 5 different ways of wieghing the thing...they have one. I really hate that programs have to fudge numbers to try to appear better to webmasters. It is deceptive and even when you think you know something about a program...then you find out you really don't.

Quote:
Of course I'm interested in something like that
I'll keep you in the loop.

Quote:
The just post everyone in alphabetical order so that you're not leading people to believe that the ranking are accurate - that's really all I'm saying in this
Hoppefully, if this software works like its supposed to...it will eliminate the guesswork and we can all see some real numbers that mean something.

__________________
Circle Of Violence
xxxjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc