|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
I like meta tags. They're reliable, they're efficient... and the surfers don't even have to know they're there, they can just continue to do what they've been doing since the birth of the internet.
![]()
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
tickler, while that is true, functionally speaking, we can be blocked anyway, or at least I assume we can, using keyword blocks, or blocks based on meta or icra tagging.
I figure that my pages, which are fairly explicitly pornographic and based on clearly adult named domains, could be blocked, if only by the meta tags already on them. Would a tagging system that allowed text and non-pornographic pages go untagged cause a huge growth in text pages for the SE's? Yeah, I think it would. I'm not saying I approve of it, I'm saying I don't see a lot of reason to fight it. It will have a far harsher impact on news and health pages than on porn pages. Politically, it's clearly a gimmick, meant to allow the pols to pretend they are doing something. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
So you're saying it'll just create one more way for cheaters to gain market share?
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|