Gonzales pulls out the big "T" word for ISP snooping

Toby · 2006-06-01, 03:19 AM

It makes no difference what it's for, unless there is a warrant for a specific user, it's a violation of the 4th Amendment.

Torn Rose · 2006-06-01, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toby

It makes no difference what it's for, unless there is a warrant for a specific user, it's a violation of the 4th Amendment.

You say that like it matters to the GOP.

lassiter · 2006-06-05, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torn

You say that like it matters to the GOP.

It doesn't matter to the Dems, either, alas. Clinton did more to expand search & seizure laws than anyone before him, and I'd rather watch my toenails grow than wait for any congressional Democrats to actually come out against this.

The enemy of our enemy is not our friend.

2006-06-01, 03:19 AM	#1
Toby Lonewolf Internet Sales Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Houston Posts: 4,826	It makes no difference what it's for, unless there is a warrant for a specific user, it's a violation of the 4th Amendment. __________________ Latex Vixens Babes In Boots Well Heeled Women Dressing For Sex Stocking Vixens