Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2006-07-22, 05:02 PM   #1
Bill
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
Vink, I'd very much like to hear a report - sorry I let this post slip by me during the week.

Did they discuss HR4472?

For those of you who aren't following the politics that affect our industry, HR 4472 is a new law, which will almost certainly be signed by Bush in a few days, that attempts to pass as legislation a much stricter set of rules that will work pretty much like the worst of the 2257 changes made by Gonzales last year.

Nobody seems really sure exactly what HR4472 is going to mean for us - what I have read of it's language seems deliberately obscure.

It's attack legislation, aimed right at our heads. While we twiddle our thumbs, 2257 and it's more dangerous cousin 4472 are coming back for us.

"For instance, H.R. 4472 adds producers of any "digital image" or "digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being" to the list in subsection (a) of §2257 of those who must keep records of performers of "actual sexually explicit conduct" and index them, while another section adds a §2257 labeling requirement, already mandatory for every magazine, videotape and DVD containing sexually-explicit matter, for "every page of a website on which matter described in subsection (a) appears."

http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=272347
Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-07-26, 12:25 AM   #2
DJilla
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
 
DJilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 525
Send a message via ICQ to DJilla
More Of The Same

Bill,

Quoting you from an earlier post I think that this is the far more ominous paragraph:

Amends the federal criminal code to: (1) establish recordkeeping requirements for the production of matter containing simulated sexually explicit conduct; and (2) prohibit the production, with the intent to transport in interstate commerce, of obscene matter. "

#2 is the time tested fed trick of making something illegal on the basis of interstate transport. When you combine the nebulous term of "obscene" with the modern method of transport (the net) you get a whole new swamp of legal wrangling that could take things back to 50's
DJilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc