Is it ethical?....

[ronnie]

One thing I've noticed, it seems 99.9% or reject e-mails never get read or least no reply, or if they even make it to the submitter, nor is it the submitter changing what is wrong. Course those are probably the multi submitters/cheaters anyways. But it's all most like it's a waste of time, dont have enough time in the day as it is. Of course this sucks for those that do what the feedback, or want to know.

Why not ask those that did'nt list you? Or if they post on a message board, send them a PM?

ronnie

[Mr. Blue]

Originally Posted by ronnie

One thing I've noticed, it seems 99.9% or reject e-mails never get read or least no reply, or if they even make it to the submitter, nor is it the submitter changing what is wrong.

I found this to be true when I was sending out rejects on my tgp, until I finally put a subject heading that kind of popped out a little more and then I got crazy webmasters complaining to me....so buh bye rejection emails...they're just not worth it.

[Jel]

Originally Posted by Mr. Blue

I found this to be true when I was sending out rejects on my tgp, until I finally put a subject heading that kind of popped out a little more and then I got crazy webmasters complaining to me....so buh bye rejection emails...they're just not worth it.

Snap. I do take the time if I recognise the submitter from the boards I use though.

[ronnie]

Originally Posted by Jel

Snap. I do take the time if I recognise the submitter from the boards I use though.

I agree, if I know the person, I will let them know, although most people, say from the board, know what they are doing, usually. It is very possible the blogging crowd is different, I did'nt think about it. Makes sense, a blog is usually more of a growing site rather than a submit and forget free site.

ronnie