|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
|
The url's end up being so long, guess thats just a personal peeve. Far as I could see most if not all of the graphics on the galleries was linked, making for some big, if not too big ads?
ronnie |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
My wife is not a doobie to be passed around! On our wedding day I promised to bogart her for life!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 277
|
Thanks to everybody for comments and suggestion. I have to admit that I overdid the advertisement, it happens when I have a bad converting month
![]() I did make changes as follows: Index: - added a small title, in the initial design the top jpg with alt was intended as title. - took out the bold on hover everywehere, I kept the color change, I hope its fine. Main page: - I reduced the linked text, decreased the font size too, probably this will make the gallery links easier to identify, although I agree again with Useless Warrior ![]() First Gallery: -reduced the table size, in my browser did look fine on 800 resolution before, now should be ok. - no font size hover anymore - changed the blind banner with text (these guys from Niched Sites should design some banners ![]() Second gallery: -removed the blind design with more defensive banners. If you are still in the mood, please visit again and you can be harder this time, as it is already Monday evening ![]() ![]() Fonz: thanks, English is my second language too, but looks like your second is better than mine ![]() <answer to mini rant> For that, MrYum, I am the one to (possibly|confused|) blame, not the sponsor. I did select the pics... Although I am doing hardcore free sites too, I still think that if the surfer wants to see fingers and penetration, at least he has to be incited to pay a louzy buck for it... If he is doing that clicking a link which I get credit for, its even better ![]() </answer to mini rant> Thanks again to everybody. ![]() Sadman Last edited by sadman; 2006-08-07 at 10:58 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Ah cool...round two
![]() Index page looks much better...but be careful about how many words of the title you use when submitting. Some sites will only accept 3 or 4...check their rules as you submit to be sure. Myself, I'm fine with 4 to 6 word titles. Looks so much better without that link changing sizes. Only thing I would say is the color of your sponsor link now blends into the background on hover. Not something I'd decline a site for, but may impact your clickthroughs. On the main page, I still find having all that image linked to the sponsor creates a blind link. And is it just me, or is there an image toolbar in the middle of that pic??? If you unlinked the bottom right slice and left just the top slice linked, you'd solve the issue. Strange, I still get a very slight side scroll on that first gallery. Again, if the rest of the site were clean...I'd let that small of a scroll slide. No blind links at all on the second gallery now, but a pretty noticable side scroll...much more than gallery one. On the mini-rant thing, that really wasn't directed at you Sadman. It was more of a general wtf...lol. I would imagine that this is the content the sponsor put up to promote the site...even though you picked it. And of course, I agree that surfers should have to pay to get the good stuff. Perhaps it's because I see so much porn...but it's just so clear that these chicks are not lesbians, but instead pornsluts posing. Anyway, back to your site. It's definitely much better, but could use just a little more tweaking ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
What can I do - I was born this way LOL
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,086
|
you know sadman I seen some of your sites on my LL admin and cant remember if or how many I listed but I like a person who tries and listens to others for there oppinion and it looks like you got some good advice there from some of the nice members of greenguy and jim clan...
I didnt even look at your site but if your not getting listed or having sales problems then your on the right track ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
My wife is not a doobie to be passed around! On our wedding day I promised to bogart her for life!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 277
|
I do see that toolbar image thing on the main page and I really don't understand why. I even took out the link and is still there with <meta HTTP-EQUIV="imagetoolbar" CONTENT="no"> in the head and not other jpg's has that
![]() Thanks MrYoum and I;ll be ready tomorrow evening for the third round. Hoefully the one with k.o. ![]() Sadman Last edited by sadman; 2006-08-08 at 01:18 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
There's Xanax in my thurible!
|
Quote:
![]() It's part of the actual image. As for the gallery 1 sidescroll, I don't have the answer, but what I do know is that I can get different page sizes sometimes in IE then I get in Firefox. And Firefox is what MrYum reviews on, so it worth testing in that browser. But what I don't get is why make the two galleries have different colored tables? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
My wife is not a doobie to be passed around! On our wedding day I promised to bogart her for life!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 277
|
That toolbar issue is solved now, my own mistake in photosop
![]() Plateman: thanks for your wise words ![]() ![]() Sadman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Looks much better Sadman
![]() The only side scroll I'm seeing now is on gallery one and it's very very slight; Here's a screen grab Actually, it's so miniscule...as a reviewer, I'd ignore it ![]() I do agree with Preacher that the different colored galleries are a bit odd. But, as far as being listable...I'd list the site as it stands now ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|