Freesites and Javascript (js)

wrk4 · 2006-08-29, 02:49 PM

Kitty_Kate -"No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me" - Offense taken!
"Btw, I didn't knew that you need..." - It's not about what you know. And the key word is need. And no I don't but I find this more efficient.

"I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much" - What can I say to that without being mean... You haven't seen it, fine. If you'd like to learn feel free to poke around cssbeauty.com or stylegala.com and look for jquery.

Hello PonyGirl - Thanks for the input. But I keep reading contradicting answers to this question. You said no but then cool Mr. Yum said yes.

What's up MrYum.

I know you're the one that declined me I just didn't want to throw your name out there. A friend of mine, who has a ll, adviced me to take it to the board to get a consensus opinion. As you can see it isn't going so well. Although disappointed, I understand your position.

Useless · 2006-08-29, 02:59 PM

This is acceptable on a free site:

Code:

<a href="http://www.shitbag.com/idiot/moron.php?id=XXXXX" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.shitbag.com/';return true" onmouseout="self.status='';return true" title="Stupid Fucker">Idiot</a>

That chunk of shit you want to use IS NOT ACCEPTABLE and isn't going to become acceptable.

ponygirl · 2006-08-29, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

This is acceptable on a free site:

Code:

<a href="http://www.shitbag.com/idiot/moron.php?id=XXXXX" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.shitbag.com/';return true" onmouseout="self.status='';return true" title="Stupid Fucker">Idiot</a>

That chunk of shit you want to use IS NOT ACCEPTABLE and isn't going to become acceptable.

hehe thanks for clarifying that, UW

wrk4, that's what I (and mrYum) meant - java NO, onmouseover YES

wrk4 · 2006-08-29, 03:07 PM

Wow, Useless!
But Ok.

thx again pgirl, mr.yum and of course UW

MrYum · 2006-08-29, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ponygirl

hehe thanks for clarifying that, UW

wrk4, that's what I (and mrYum) meant - java NO, onmouseover YES

Exactamundo

No worries Wrk4...you can always leave a message on these forums with questions for me...or hit me up on email. So, feel free to toss me |bus| anytime

wrk4 · 2006-08-29, 05:37 PM

Yes.

However, let it be known that the code you all agree to be acceptable is actually called javascript. Hence the misunderstanding. The js is performing the onmouseover function. One can assume that this is the only piece of js code that is allowed.

To further clarify -
Java (programming lang) code is very different from js and I doubt anyone will use this.

Useless · 2006-08-29, 06:09 PM

Why isn't there a sticky thread of all the shit we already know so that newbies to this part of the game won't stumble in and attempt to correct our woeful ignorance in an uppity manner?

Do I seem grouchy today? When I read my posts, they look much grouchier than I feel.

zack2004 · 2006-08-29, 06:27 PM

UW,
It is not what you say but how you say it!
In the future try "Dear Cocksucker, Dear Asshole, Dear Stupid MF....." in the salutation of your response instead of in the body of the message. Also try to limit your caffeine intake

.

kitty_kate · 2006-08-29, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrk4

Kitty_Kate -"No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me" - Offense taken!
"Btw, I didn't knew that you need..." - It's not about what you know. And the key word is need. And no I don't but I find this more efficient.

"I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much" - What can I say to that without being mean... You haven't seen it, fine. If you'd like to learn feel free to poke around cssbeauty.com or stylegala.com and look for jquery.

Efficient my flat ass!
The uncompressed version of jquery has 1814 lines of code. Didn't you thought that people may get a little suspicious when you'll tell them you need a huge AJAX library to make a bloody mouseover?

I won't discuss this anyfurther. If you really want, we can continue on PM.

Oh shit, I ran out of cigarettes

2006-08-29, 02:49 PM	#1
wrk4 A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 56	Kitty_Kate -"No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me" - Offense taken! "Btw, I didn't knew that you need..." - It's not about what you know. And the key word is need. And no I don't but I find this more efficient. "I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much" - What can I say to that without being mean... You haven't seen it, fine. If you'd like to learn feel free to poke around cssbeauty.com or stylegala.com and look for jquery. Hello PonyGirl - Thanks for the input. But I keep reading contradicting answers to this question. You said no but then cool Mr. Yum said yes. What's up MrYum. I know you're the one that declined me I just didn't want to throw your name out there. A friend of mine, who has a ll, adviced me to take it to the board to get a consensus opinion. As you can see it isn't going so well. Although disappointed, I understand your position. Last edited by wrk4; 2006-08-29 at 02:56 PM..

2006-08-29, 02:59 PM	#2
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	This is acceptable on a free site: Code: <a href="http://www.shitbag.com/idiot/moron.php?id=XXXXX" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.shitbag.com/';return true" onmouseout="self.status='';return true" title="Stupid Fucker">Idiot</a> That chunk of shit you want to use IS NOT ACCEPTABLE and isn't going to become acceptable. __________________ Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.

2006-08-29, 03:07 PM	#4
wrk4 A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 56	Wow, Useless! But Ok. thx again pgirl, mr.yum and of course UW Last edited by wrk4; 2006-08-29 at 03:11 PM..

2006-08-29, 05:37 PM	#6
wrk4 A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 56	Yes. However, let it be known that the code you all agree to be acceptable is actually called javascript. Hence the misunderstanding. The js is performing the onmouseover function. One can assume that this is the only piece of js code that is allowed. To further clarify - Java (programming lang) code is very different from js and I doubt anyone will use this. Last edited by wrk4; 2006-08-29 at 05:51 PM..

2006-08-29, 06:09 PM	#7
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	Why isn't there a sticky thread of all the shit we already know so that newbies to this part of the game won't stumble in and attempt to correct our woeful ignorance in an uppity manner? Do I seem grouchy today? When I read my posts, they look much grouchier than I feel. __________________ Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.

2006-08-29, 06:27 PM	#8
zack2004 Ahhh ... sweet pity. Where would my love life be without it? Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New Jersey, USA Posts: 209	UW, It is not what you say but how you say it! In the future try "Dear Cocksucker, Dear Asshole, Dear Stupid MF....." in the salutation of your response instead of in the body of the message. Also try to limit your caffeine intake . __________________ Zack Free XXX Twat Porn Links Twat Porn Blog Last edited by zack2004; 2006-08-29 at 06:30 PM..