Need A Review

[Licker4U]

I would appreciate any comments and suggestions that might make this site better: http://www.best-wet-pussy.com/one-hot-mom/

[pigbait75]

I was making the same mistake of using frontpage way too much for design try to get your hands on photo shop or some other program that will make your site look more fancy I,m still new it this myself but it gets easier

[JustRobert]

You have 4 outgoing links on the main page. Other than that alot of lists will not accept NastyDollars content for they use it themself. Check the rules at the lists before subbing.

Fix the mainpage to 3 links and I would accept it, with my recip on it of course

[virgohippy]

Gotta watch those outgoing links.

[Xallow]

I would accept that... If I could just get You to submit it to me

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by JustRobert

You have 4 outgoing links on the main page. Other than that alot of lists will not accept NastyDollars content for they use it themself. Check the rules at the lists before subbing.

Fix the mainpage to 3 links and I would accept it, with my recip on it of course

The image and linked text are seperated by plain text but it's all part of ONE table. I've had this discussion with a few others and "most" link lists consider that page to have three links. LOR, HOES, PenisBot, Free Porn Post, Bratt's and 48 others listed it. Come to think of it, only one out of the 54 I submit to says it's a problem...|noclue|

But besides the link issue, is there anything specific about "selling" that I can make better?

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by pigbait75

I was making the same mistake of using frontpage way too much for design try to get your hands on photo shop or some other program that will make your site look more fancy I,m still new it this myself but it gets easier

The very first site I built I used Front Page. After that I hand coded everything. "View Source" and "copy and paste" taught me a lot.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by Xallow

I would accept that... If I could just get You to submit it to me

I probably will since I'm putting together another recip table with nine recips in it to bring my recips up to sixty three. |rasta|

[JustRobert]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

The image and linked text are seperated by plain text but it's all part of ONE table. I've had this discussion with a few others and "most" link lists consider that page to have three links. LOR, HOES, PenisBot, Free Porn Post, Bratt's and 48 others listed it. Come to think of it, only one out of the 54 I submit to says it's a problem...|noclue|

But besides the link issue, is there anything specific about "selling" that I can make better?

I will be damned you are right. I see that its listed at LOR. I guess I did not get the memo that says multiple links within a table counts as one.

I would really like to hear from MrYum and MML on this. I could easily make a table with lets say 6 outgoing links in it but it would just be considered 1? Or is there a limitation within that table before its too much

With that being said then I would probably accept it as is. As far as the selling it seems to be fine for the "in your face method" as I call it. You may want to use that method in one portion of selling and then try a softer approach as well. Selling how beautiful the women are, a generalization of whats inside and so on. This way you cover yourself. Some guys/girls like the hard sell but others are turned off by it. Hope thats what you were looking for.

[rachelo]

I only did about 15 sites but I think that you do have 4 links on the main page. I think the top table has 2 links. Thaen again I might be wrong.

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by JustRobert

I will be damned you are right. I see that its listed at LOR. I guess I did not get the memo that says multiple links within a table counts as one.

I would really like to hear from MrYum and MML on this. I could easily make a table with lets say 6 outgoing links in it but it would just be considered 1? Or is there a limitation within that table before its too much

With that being said then I would probably accept it as is. As far as the selling it seems to be fine for the "in your face method" as I call it. You may want to use that method in one portion of selling and then try a softer approach as well. Selling how beautiful the women are, a generalization of whats inside and so on. This way you cover yourself. Some guys/girls like the hard sell but others are turned off by it. Hope thats what you were looking for.

Yep, there have been a couple threads on the subject of the intent of ads. Opinions do vary amongst reviewers, but I would count that as a single ad.

I don't count hrefs, I do count the intent of the adspace. HOWEVER, there is a line that can be crossed and six links would definitely do it...lol.

Yea, I know...it does get a bit subjective. I'd say to be on the safe side...try very hard to keep it to 3 hrefs per page...don't give reviewers a reason to decline your sites. It's always the safest way to go

[JustRobert]

Thanks for answering my call on this MrYum. I understand that his table is done to look more like a selling banner but I have always gone with do not give the reviewers a reason to reject method as well so I would probably not do that anyway. Of course, I have the occasional oops, but I am human. LOL

Guess I had not seen those threads or probably would not have given that a second thought Licker4U. Once again I would accept it.

[virgohippy]

Originally Posted by MrYum

Yep, there have been a couple threads on the subject of the intent of ads. Opinions do vary amongst reviewers, but I would count that as a single ad.

Don't anyone quote me on this, but I've let 4 link sites slide by on occasion too... but being a nit picky Virgo, it's not something I'd like to admit in decent conversation.

Originally Posted by MrYum

I don't count hrefs, I do count the intent of the adspace. HOWEVER, there is a line that can be crossed and six links would definitely do it...lol.

I completely agree, six is pushing too far. Furthermore, I think it was Ponygirl who most recently pointed out the, "if you give an inch, they may walk all over you" idea - which is why I tend to be a bit of a prick about the three count.

But now that my new script makes the review process so much easier I can let my submitters know when they've too many outgoing links for my taste, so all they have to do is make a quick fix.

Originally Posted by MrYum

Yea, I know...it does get a bit subjective. I'd say to be on the safe side...try very hard to keep it to 3 hrefs per page...don't give reviewers a reason to decline your sites. It's always the safest way to go

I hear DD can be real nit picky... but I also hear his traffic is gold. IMO, it just might be worth the effort to get into the habit of making quality sites that don't send up ANY red flags if only to someday get an invite from him.

[Licker4U]

Sorry, didn't mean for this thread to turn into a "# of href's " debate. I know who lists my sites "as is" and who don't. This is what I was looking for:
I need constructive criticism on how to get surfers to click through to the sponsors tour. After that it's pretty much out of my hands. The tour then has to do the selling. (Albeit, picking good tours that I think surfers will like is a part of selling that I can do on MY end)

Since I got a new domain six weeks ago and started getting listed at a few of the larger lists my traffic has gone from around 2.5K hit/day to around 10K hits/day. My server stats suck so I don't know how many are unique but at 10K I'm sure there are a lot of uniques in there somewhere. As I mentioned in another thread my sales ratios are decent, averaging around 1:150. I just need to get more traffic to click through. I may post my next site and ask for suggestions.

[Licker4U]

OK, what can I do to make this site generate click throughs?

http://www.best-wet-pussy.com/first-porn-audition/

Thanks for any suggestions!

[SheepGuy]

Originally Posted by Xallow

I would accept that... If I could just get You to submit it to me

Ditto for me

[JustRobert]

First thing is your first thumb on gallery 1 did not load for me even though I tried refreshing 3 times just to make sure.

I think your in the face tactic should be just fine. Cannot see to much to improve on with that tactic. I stated this earlier, its all in your face tactic which is a turn off for some. Some people do not like that. You use fuck over and over. Try other similar words like nasty, naughty, randy, humping etc.... You just never know what keyword combination the engines will grab onto or will hit that nerve within the surfer that makes them whip out that wallet.

[Licker4U]

Thanks, that's what I was looking for

[JustRobert]

Not a problem and good luck with it. I would accept it as is, just in case you missed that earlier too, because I forgot to say it.

[DJilla]

A couple of points regarding sell thru. Sometimes its just hard to figure out what people will respond to until you get enough sales on a page to make you notice. Then take that page a dup it with different highlights, colors, and pics and see if it sells the same average. Messing and tweaking sales text is tough and should be done slowly and in bits at a time for fear that you loose whatever magic the page had.

One idea that does pop up though is that if you design for more pictures on your content page (15 or 16) all you have to do is split the pages, increase the thumb sizes to about 150 pix and now you've also got a gallery to submit with little extra work.

Also, IMHO colors play an important role in peoples behaivor. Dark green is not known as a great motivator. I would look in the world at large and try and copy the color scheme (and maybe even page layout) that you see in high end magazines where the compainies have spent much moola trying to figure out how to make people act.

Also, I've said this before but newbie designers and marketeers can do well by studying "mail order marketing". The concepts and rules are very, very, close.

Finally, I used to use FP for about 40% of my work. It was just too easy not to. However, MS has announced that FP is being dropped and won't be supported past this year (I think this year) in favor of the website design suite they have developed. Learning this I first said "FUCK"... now I am doing about 90% of my work in DW.

Good Luck