What do you think about these?

[Licker4U]

I think Tre wanted feedback on design, layout, sales text...the same things other site builders ask for. The only thing close to feedback was:

Originally Posted by DangerDave

I think the tours look like bog standard "reality" template tours which off nothing to the surfer at all..
DD

When I saw the first vid I almost became UW Jr. I forgot everyting on the site I had seen and couldn't go back and look at anything because of what was going on in my head. I'm not qualified to comment on site building but if anyone can get past the vids I'm sure Tre would appreciate comments on the site structure regardless of the content.

[Useless]

GG - if a bunch of experienced pornographers saw the video and all said "wow, that's bad", you've got realize that it wasn't run of the mill rough sex. I don't care how slippery the slope may be - some people cross the line and need be punched in the cock. We all have an internal trigger when we view this shit and we have to trust it, whether it goes off because the teen on a site looks too young or the level of violence toward a women is too much or too real.

Now, I never had any intention of making a single reply to this guy's thread because I thought it should have been dumped to the spam forum right from the start. He claims that he wants feedback, but all he really wants is attention brought to the programs new sites. Semi-clever spam.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

GG - if a bunch of experienced pornographers saw the video and all said "wow, that's bad", you've got realize that it wasn't run of the mill rough sex. I don't care how slippery the slope may be - some people cross the line and need be punched in the cock. We all have an internal trigger when we view this shit and we have to trust it, whether it goes off because the teen on a site looks too young or the level of violence toward a women is too much or too real...

Again, I didn't see it, but based on what I read about the slapping & very rough sex, would it have been looked at differently if she was in leather/latex with some rope bondage & instead of being slapped, her ass was being beat red with a horse bridal (sp) that was yielded by a leather clad stud in a Pulp Fiction gimp mask?

That being said, I doubt I'd list a site that had that content on it. LOR now has a "Reviewer Is Not Comfortable With Content" rejection reason for sites with very extreme content. I'm not endorsing this content, just their right to produce it.

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

...Now, I never had any intention of making a single reply to this guy's thread because I thought it should have been dumped to the spam forum right from the start. He claims that he wants feedback, but all he really wants is attention brought to the programs new sites. Semi-clever spam.

My initial reaction was the same thing until I saw how badly he was being beaten up

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Again, I didn't see it, but based on what I read about the slapping & very rough sex, would it have been looked at differently if she was in leather/latex with some rope bondage & instead of being slapped, her ass was being beat red with a horse bridal (sp) that was yielded by a leather clad stud in a Pulp Fiction gimp mask?

Actually, no I don't think it would have been taken any differently. While it's probably known that I'm more picky about this kind of content than many, this stuff was really bad. It didn't look consentual...hell, the girl was crying and appeared to want it to stop