|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating: ![]() |
Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman!
|
Quote:
![]() Hm - I did do 1:422 on a particular sponsor's gay twink site (non-NATS) but no, I'm not telling which. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman!
|
NATS stats weirdness
OK, I just dumped one NATS sponsor where I had a horrendously bad sales ratio (as mentioned earlier in this thread) but now I've signed up with a new sponsor that does the exact same thing the old one did that makes my "bogosity" meter go into the red.
On the standard NATS stats interface, you get a breakdown by "raw," "unique," "signups,: etc. and then on the right side is "Break down by: site, program, campaign." I've only been promoting this sponsor since the 2nd. I had 3 hits under "unique" each day for the first two days. I can click that numeral "3" for each day and get the referring FHG urls that sent the traffic to the tour. And when I click the "Break down by site" link, I get the two sites I was promoting, and the 3 total hits. So far so good. But as of today, the "unique" hits show 33 hits so far. Wow! My links must be doing really well! But when I click the "33" under unique, it only shows 2 referring URLs with 1 hit each. Hmmm. Ah but now, when I click the "break down by site" link I get a list of hits to a bunch of sites that I'm not promoting and didn't even know were in the program! Where the hell is that coming from? The NATS system of the aforementioned first sponsor was doing the exact same thing. And now I suspect that I was really only sending that sponsor 1/20th of the actual hits the sponsor claimed I was sending. Why would a sponsor do this? All it does is make my sales ratio look 100 times worse than it actually might be - and that's supposed to encourage me to promote them? Rather the opposite, since I dropped Sponsor #1 like a hot potato when I looked at my end-of-year stats. Most of my other NATS-using sponsors appear to give me accurate, or at least believeable, data. Can anyone explain what's going on with this? Obviously the NATS folks themselves aren't gonna do it, and I'd like to get some perspective on this before I contact the new sponsor. [Edit: I did ICQ the rep for sponsor #1 about this issue a few days ago, but they haven't seen fit to reply yet. So I guess I can mention that it's PanchoDog. |pissed| ] Last edited by lassiter; 2007-01-04 at 07:35 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Allow me to take a moment to applaud Exclusively4Affiliates' decision to discontinue the use of NATS and return to being a great amateur paysite program. Thank you Mark.
![]() E4A email notice: Quote:
![]()
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
While part of me is glad that they did this, part of me is pissed because I think this is the 4th (maybe 5th) processing/admin/linkcode move/change in the last 3 or 4 years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
Quote:
I remember signing up to promote them years ago. They then moved to a new admin, so I swapped the link codes. They then did it again (might have gone back to the 1st one) so I just pulled the links. Then they moved to CCBill & Mark asked me to sign up again. When I asked if they planned on changing admins in the future, he told me about going to NATS, so I waited until that was released before I signed up. So now I'm back to doing this a lot ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Certified Nice Person
|
Wow, it's gonna be a real bitch when they move to MPA3 in a few months.
![]()
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
|
Quote:
I'm not sure if this would help you out now or not, you may already know this, but for those that don't here is a little bit of php code that might come in helpful: <?php header("Location: http://www.yahoo.com"); ?> Save the above code in a text editor like notepad, name it and give it a .php extension. Upload to your server. (first change yahoo.com to your appropiate link code for that particular sponsor) Now you can link to files like this for all your sponsors. If the sponsor goes down, changes link codes, doesn't perform any more, whatever may happen, all you have to do is edit that one file to a new link code or new sponsor. This is good idea for tgp gallery submitters that have 100's of thousands of pages and want to change a link code and not alter the original page and set off any TGP owners alarms. You can also use php ads or similar scripts but I find this more simple and you can use it on as many domains as you want. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
You've never run a link list
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
Let's say the one for Wet Wifey MILF is called wet-wifey-milf.php. The file itself would look like this: PHP Code:
All that little php page does is redirect the surfer to the correct page. They never realize that they've been to wet-wifey-milf.php. It's a good tecnique for free site and gallery builders. I'm sorta sorry I mentioned this whole E4A thing as this point. ![]()
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. Last edited by Useless; 2007-01-08 at 08:41 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|