Starting Link List-Need Info

Licker4U · 2007-02-22, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maj. Stress

Licker,
You can set how many listings per page that you want. With Dragon Links you can also display oldest first or newest first. Your choice.

Thanks Major. So, they don't rotate? It's one or the other? When I have a lot of listings the older ones will be buried on page umpty-ump that no one will see?

Licker4U · 2007-02-22, 05:43 AM

I re-read Preacher's thread and noticed something about staying away from tables. What's wrong with tables?

Lemmy · 2007-02-22, 06:38 AM

Licker, you can display the links any way you like, old first, new first, randomly, 5 per page or a million per page; your choice. I display the links using tables on both sites where I run the script with no problems. I think the objections were mostly that tables add (unnecessary?) weight to a page. If you check the pages on QP I think you'll agree they load zippety fast, though. Now go out and buy the damn script already!

Licker4U · 2007-02-22, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemmy

Now go out and buy the damn script already!

As soon as the Bitch opens up her damn purse and gives me some of my money.

Lemmy · 2007-02-22, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U

As soon as the Bitch opens up her damn purse and gives me some of my money.

You guys obviously need marriage counseling.

Licker4U · 2007-02-22, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemmy

You guys obviously need marriage counseling.

It'll take more than one

probably

. I think a seasoned dog catcher would have his hands full...

Preacher · 2007-02-22, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U

I re-read Preacher's thread and noticed something about staying away from tables. What's wrong with tables?

Nothing is wrong with tables, they work better for cross browser support. I have just become a css snob.

Licker4U · 2007-02-22, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preacher

Nothing is wrong with tables, they work better for cross browser support. I have just become a css snob.

I think I saw somewhere that you can use <div> or something to make a table. Do you find it easier that plain html?

Preacher · 2007-02-22, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U

I think I saw somewhere that you can use <div> or something to make a table. Do you find it easier that plain html?

If you end up going with draginlists, you can set the build type to table and it will output the links surrounded by tr's and td's. If you are comfortable with tables I would suggest starting that way, so you aren't troubleshooting both your list include & your css .

You can always move to a non-table version in the future if you need or want to.

Licker4U · 2007-02-22, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preacher

You can always move to a non-table version in the future if you need or want to.

Kewl

2007-02-22, 06:38 AM	#3
Lemmy You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Next door to a kid with a moped. Posts: 1,492	Licker, you can display the links any way you like, old first, new first, randomly, 5 per page or a million per page; your choice. I display the links using tables on both sites where I run the script with no problems. I think the objections were mostly that tables add (unnecessary?) weight to a page. If you check the pages on QP I think you'll agree they load zippety fast, though. Now go out and buy the damn script already! __________________ BUY MY PORNSITES!

2007-02-22, 05:43 AM	#2
Licker4U Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Lower Alabama-The Redneck Riviera Posts: 2,377	I re-read Preacher's thread and noticed something about staying away from tables. What's wrong with tables?