Define a quality post

[T Pat]

Originally Posted by walrus

I'd like to hear what others think would make up a quality post. We all feel that sponsors feeds suck for the most part but I would counter that most bloggers suck.

As a group, if we can't define what it is we're looking for then sponsors that do want to provide quality feeds are left with a moving target to try and shoot at because I can tell you, what I am really looking for in a blog or a feed is going to be different than the next guy.

The way I see it there are three basic types of adult blogs
1, Babelog, a post consists of a photo, a title, text is usually a sentence or the title repeated. This has to be the least effective blog but better than nothing.
2, Splog, most posts are sponsor supplied feeds, a post consists of a photo, a title and a paragraph of text.
3, Blog, most posts are original text and the blog encourages reader participation.

The beauty of a blog is it can be anything you want so any combination babelog, splog, blog is cool and totally up to the webmasters skill and time constraints.

I’m sure I would melt the spell check right out of my computer and still end up with a shitty blog if I wrote every post. I just don’t have the skill or imagination to write like Simon, Walrus, Grandmascrotum, SueFi or Tigermom so I want (need) all the Good Sponsor Feeds I can get. (yes Walrus I suck)

I thought the purpose of this thread was to define what a quality Sponsor Hosted Feed is not what a quality post is.
I still think:
1, catchy title
2, relevant paragraph of 250 words or more with some good sales text
3, one photo
is a Quality Sponsor Feed.