Gallery advice, please

[Mr. Blue]

Keep the 2257 link as enough tgps require it's inclusion...Just don't link back to your hub/tgp/LL, etc as that would be considered a traffic leak and depending on the owner will get your gallery deleted or in the worst case get you blacklisted.

As for the galleries...they're all okay. The third gallery if it had a header would be the best of the group. That gallery you did the thumbs the best and that makes it slightly better than the second. The second gallery is okay, but the thumbs are very slightly blurred and you didn't crop them effectively. In a thumbnail do you need to see she's standing in front of a leather couch? Nah, lol, so try and focus on what would get a surfer to click around. I mean the thumbs on gallery 2 are okay, but they could be better.

[Preacher]

There are a couple mentions of headers, if you are using sponsor content, is it Ok to use sponsor supplied headers, or is that problematic because hosted galleries could also have those same headers?

[Mr. Blue]

Originally Posted by Preacher

There are a couple mentions of headers, if you are using sponsor content, is it Ok to use sponsor supplied headers, or is that problematic because hosted galleries could also have those same headers?

Personally I avoid using sponsor graphics period. If a sponsor is offering headers, footers, and even banners (unless they're geo-targeted type banners), I avoid them like the plague. To each his own though.

You have to think about how many people are submitting galleries, how many times a reviewer is going to see the same type gallery, the same graphics, etc. Even small tgps are getting around 1k-2k in submits per day...they're reviewing those galleries quickly...if things start looking repetitive it's a pretty good chance your gallery won't get listed.

Headers don't have to be complex though...5 minutes in photoshop and you can create a text header (3-d, drop shadow, etc) type graphic that would serve well as a header.