link-o-rama.com picture height and width rule

[Useless]

Originally Posted by larrylint

I do not my following rules but they should be fair to all. I noticed that many links are posted that do not meet your 1200 rule.

Those would be old listings (from before the rule was instituted) and hosted free sites. The LOR isn't playing favorites or being discriminatory.

If anyone would like to complain about other rules, such as no free hosting, no pop-ups, or no CP, go ahead and do that now. It's just as pointless. I didn't want to seem arrogant, but rules are rules. Fewer fucking people bitched when NetPond buried their free site listings, dropped their link exchanges and demanded 100 word fucking descriptions. Christ!

[Greenguy]

My opinion on this is in the http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=33685 thread as well as in this thread (odd how my opinions are the same as a couple other people - lol)

But what struck me as odd is this statement:

Originally Posted by xxxthrills

...What I ask is that you re-consider and change this rule to the longest side being 600 pixels for pic (especially for pornstar photos). I would like to submit my sites to your link list again, but not under the current picture height and width requirements!....

Let me guess: you have a pornstar sponsor that you like to promote, but their pics are 600 on the long side & that limits you as far as where you can submit the sites/galleries. Am I right?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Greenie

My opinion on this...

Hey! Stay out of my thread!