|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 111
|
Yes, it looks a lot better. Whatever was broke, you fixed it quick. I'm looking in FF by the way.
Hmm. Getting the same as UW in IE6. Source code says there are height and width attributes on the image tags without values. Nothing else stands out, but it's 3.30 a.m. here and the brain isn't functioning on all cylinders. New to you UW? Not heard of IE breaking perfectly good web sites? Now that is new. Good to hear about Safari, UW. I don't have it but have heard it's great. Is a Linux version available yet? Last edited by horney; 2008-01-31 at 10:40 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
Images disappearing in one browser while existing fine in another is new to me - yes. Things generally laying out differently in IE as opposed to Firefox is not new to me though. I've given up caring about which is at fault and find it more fruitful to seek hacks which appease each of them.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Internet! Is that thing still around?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
|
ouch, what a shame|shocking|. I've tested layout in IE before placing the thumbs. But now everything should be ok.
I've replaced blind links also. I don't use keywords meta tag since google don't care them, so it's waste of time imo. Except description tag, which is used in serp. I wanted to start at minimum cost, so I used promo content. I've planned to purchase some fresh content after first signups & first bucks. Maybe I should have chose less saturated sponsor? Thanks for helping me ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|