Sites that accept the new Link O'Rama Trusted Submitter format

[Star Man]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Also, amongst the list of things trusted submitters are allowed to do that normal submitters are not, what are you excited about? Inquiring minds want to know.

For starters I can get into movies again and not have to get hit with a 80 dollar bandwidth bill.I can have a main page and do a 'bonus gallery' type thing along with my standard galleries.I'm hoping it will snap surfers out of that robot like 'click,click,click,next site,click' mode.Theres a bunch of other ideas I have but for now,this alone excites me.You didn't think I was doing back flips over a private whois did you?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Star Man

Theres a bunch of other ideas I have but for now,this alone excites me.

I was excited about Free Site 1.5, but I didn't get that past the porn congress.

[SheepGuy]

The iframes are what I like, they pull like shit pulls stink, and give me checks every week that I would like to make into bigger checks.
I might experiment with the hosted galleries thing as well, the thought had never crossed my mind and it seems easy enough to do.
People who submit to me have partner accounts as well, and nobody with free hosting will get a PA from me, same goes for a hidden whois, but if you're a partner that means I trust you, if I see something I don't like I'll let you know.
And I'm not really jumping on a bandwagon, I've always allowed a lot of leeway to those who submit to me.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I was excited about Free Site 1.5, but I didn't get that past the porn congress.

No matter what you say, that's still a Hub when you go to 2.0

BTW - you do make a lot of GREAT points, some of which I have not thought about (like my old friends at Sextracker) so I may need to fine-tune my rules to have a couple of exceptions.

[Maj. Stress]

Originally Posted by Greenie

No matter what you say, that's still a Hub when you go to 2.0

BTW - you do make a lot of GREAT points, some of which I have not thought about (like my old friends at Sextracker) so I may need to fine-tune my rules to have a couple of exceptions.

I don't understand the free email rule myself. If you had a valid email before why would you have a need for a free one now?

And for those of you that like hosted movies and banners, please make sure they are reliable. I've already declined a few sites because of loading issues. It might be a good idea to randomly check hosted banners and galleries for a few days before you start using them to make sure they are reliable. It is really not worth going through the effort of building and submitting a site to have a linkchecker remove it because the page no longer works.

[LD]

Originally Posted by Maj. Stress

I don't understand the free email rule myself. If you had a valid email before why would you have a need for a free one now?

And for those of you that like hosted movies and banners, please make sure they are reliable. I've already declined a few sites because of loading issues.

Yeah, I've had that problem...also, someone pointed out to me that those hosted embedded type videos usually count as a link since most of them link back to the sponsor. I ended up with 7+ outgoing links on a couple of my site galleries, until someone was kind enough to tell me to "cut that shit out, dammit..."