What makes a good Sponsor Hosted RSS Feed

[walrus]

Originally Posted by papagmp

I'm learning - but it doesn't happen overnight. I do enjoy writing - and for the most part, my posts are the "story" of what went down on the shoot. It's helped me a lot to help other newbee's create their text - makes me look at my own a little closer.

You have an interesting perspective from which to write but it probably would work best on a personal blog. I really believe there are millions of guys who wonder what it's like to work behind the scenes of a porn shoot.

For an affiliate RSS feed, I have no complaints about yours.

Originally Posted by papagmp

I would say - unless your model's name is your keyword but you might hit me with your dumb-ass stick.

That's a fair point but I promise your amateur sisters name is not a valid keyword.

Originally Posted by papagmp

Actually - this is a great point. I spent all morning with an affiliate explaining the role titles, key-words, tags, and categories play in things such as keyword density etc... I still have a lot to hear here but so far my traffic results are to the positive.

Thank you, I do make sense now and then

Originally Posted by papagmp

Ya - I know, you mean PapaGMP should get off his ass and post more often - but I have to fuck a "sister" on camera in an hour - the posting will have to wait

I wish you were the only sponsor who needs a boot up their ass to actually update their hosted feeds.

And it's ok, if you (you in the general sense and not poor Papa) don't think the investment in time is worth it DONT OFFER THEM.

Originally Posted by papagmp

Get wider themes! I like images at least 500 wide, wider on my personal blogs - but I try to never go over 450 on my hosted blogs or blogs intended to be used as feeds. It sure would be nice to have an option on the incoming - or outgoing feed to resize images over xxx pixels wide

I like my themes the way I have them built, thank you and just because you think something works better don't mean I do

Seriously, I can go 500 px wide. My theme would accommidate it. I just like 400. But if your not going to provide choices like Simon pointed out you do have to be concerned with a lowest common denominator.

Originally Posted by papagmp

What about WP 2.5's (and higher) ability to float the image? On most of my blogs, the template overrides this anyway so I usually don't use this feature.

I don't mind but how does that affect my 2.26 blogs. I really don't mind, at all, if you use CSS to format your posts as long as you provide it to me so I can use it too.

Originally Posted by papagmp

I give you both choice's - personally - I hate morphed feeds.

Yep, 1 brownie point for you.

Originally Posted by papagmp

????? - Are you saying that the first +/- three lines of a WP feed become the "post information" And where would I load "item / description"?

Give me more - show me examples. And ways to prevent it..... please

Again, is this soimething I do with my feed software, in the post etc....

Since your using WP, you have no problem with your feed structure but I'll explain anyway. Below is a typical RSS feed for a single post. Hopefully I've made it readable

- <rss version="2.0">

− <channel>

      <title>Site Title</title>

      <atom:link Site RSS Feed Link />

      <link>Link to Site</link>

      <description>Site Description</description>

      <pubDate>Date Post Published </pubDate>

      <generator>What Script Generated the Feed</generator>

      <language> Language </language>

− <item>

           − <title>Title of Post </title>

           −<link> Link to Post </link>

          − <comments>  Link to comments page </comments>

            <pubDate> Date and Time Post Published</pubDate>

            <dc:creator> Who Wrote the Post</dc:creator>

            <category> First Category of Post</category>

            <category> Second Category </category>

            <category> Third Category</category>

         − <guid isPermaLink="false">  Link to Post </guid>

        − <description>  SUMMER VENGEANCE MATCH
SYD BLACK The NightmareHT: 5′2WT: 115lbsLifetime record (7-2)Ranked 1st
Darling Th GrapplerHT: 5′4WT: 119lbsLifetime record (9-4)Ranked 4th
Welcome to the second annual Summer Vengeance elimination tournament where the top sixteen Season Five wrestlers battle it out to see who will be the overall Ultimate Surrender champion for 2008. This is the edited version of the [...]
         </description>

        − <content:encoded>
<p><a href="http://www.ultimatesurrender.com/php/redirect.php?9808:revshare" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://ads.ultimatesurrender.com/imagedb/5664/i/h/125/1.jpg" width="125" height="125" border="0"/ /></a><br/><br  /><b>SUMMER VENGEANCE MATCH</b><br />
<table cellpadding="10px">
<tr>
<td width="50%" valign="top" align="left"><b><u>SYD BLACK</u></b> <br  />The Nightmare<br  />HT: 5′2<br  />WT: 115lbs<br  />Lifetime record (7-2)<br  />Ranked 1st</td>
<td width="50%" valign="top" align="left"><b><u>Darling</u></b> <br  />Th Grappler<br  />HT: 5′4<br  />WT: 119lbs<br  />Lifetime record (9-4)<br  />Ranked 4th</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><br/>Welcome to the second annual Summer Vengeance elimination tournament where the top sixteen Season Five wrestlers battle it out to see who will be the overall Ultimate Surrender champion for 2008. <br/><br/>This is the edited version of the match that was presented live to members last Tuesday night.  <br/><br/>If you missed the live broadcast and somehow missed the streaming link, here is your chance to see what happened last Tuesday night as hundreds of members watched this match unfold live before their eyes.  <br/><br/>Join today for the only non-scripted real sexual wresting on the net!<br  /></p>
	
</content:encoded>

− <wfw:commentRss>  Comments RSS Feed </wfw:commentRss>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>

So under the channel items you have all the information on the creation of the site. You've got site title, link, description, last date something was published to the site, etc.

What I would love to see here is that the link information under the channel heading would be my referral code and not a link to the blog. Of course this would benefit me because I know how to extract that information. Most aggregators ignore it.

Everything from <item> to </item> is post information. Most of it is self explainitory. You can see that the description is just the first section of the content:encode section, as it should be.

Content:Encode is the post information. See all that table shit and formatting. Assholes

Because mainstreamers consider it bad manners (theft) to use the complete feed, most / many of the WP aggregators only read the description. Some dumbass porn mongor convinced a number of sponsors that they needed to put the post information in the description area so he could use RSS feeds.

IMHO The problem is a lot of the WP aggregators seem to throw up when they run across shit like tables and text formatting in this area. This is why you get some WP plug-ins that work with some feeds, don't work with others, will work sometimes and not others etc. So in other words, someone who wanted a band-aid fix created a cluster fuck which makes Kaktus some cash.

PS KAKTUS - See all those <category> tags in the feed, turn them into tags for me, PLEASE

The correct answer way back then would have been for someone to actually have written a plug-in that read the content:encode area.

So just use BA, problem solved.... except that there are many other mainstream tools that would be nice to be able to use that also puke when they get shit in item / description.

So sponsors who do that limit, me their marketing arm, in how I can actually use their feeds.

Originally Posted by papagmp

I had this discussion with an affiliate this morning. I know there is no hard and fast rule - but the way I explained it to him was;

If the post/blog has all the information the surfer requires to be ready to buy a membership, link to the join page.

If the post/blog is about a specific model, link to a gallery (or BYOT tour) featuring that model.

If the post/blog is about the "site" in general, link to the tour.

And IMO, don't be afraid to mix it up.

It's really difficult to explain and is a personal style thing. I'll link to a FHG or a models page from the thumb, depending on which I like best.

I usually try to link to the tour early in the post and to the join page toward the end of the post.

But that's a kind of general guide line that probably gets followed about 20% of the time. The rest of the time I pretty much play it by ear and do what I think will work best with the post.

Pretty scientific

Originally Posted by papagmp

And thanks for sharing "the top of your head"

Can I have the top of my head back now