|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 249
|
I also respect your position, Toby (don't get the wrong impression!) et al but I would much prefer a legal model who looks underage than the opposite situation of one that looks 18-20 and actually underage. That said, there are hardcore and fetish niches I personally am not comfortable with.
__________________
"TGP2 Queen" and yes, still crazy! My TGP2 articles on right hand side |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
From the very first post this discussion has been about legal age models that appear younger than 18 deliberately pushing the 'look younger than legal' aspect. I'm more than a little uncomfortable with that. And for the record, I'm also not comfortable with many of those hardcore fetish niches. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I can now put whatever you want in this space :)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Merica!
Posts: 543
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live and learn. And take very careful notes!
|
the only issue i have with porn is, when a girl looks to young in my point of view i wont list it, i dont fucking care the 2257 sais she has the right age, when i think she looks underage and she gives a wrong thinking to guys on the pics, i wont list it...i wont fucking deal with it...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
![]() But, that doesn't mean I won't promote it. To each their own I guess. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
That'll teach you to leave your sister unattended.....
|
Read the Child Protections Act: Section 18 U.S.C. 2257
nuf said................... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|