Dutch Porn sites do not have to prove model's age

[Toby]

Originally Posted by artwilliams

The chance of an inspection of a foreign webmaster doing non-extreme sites is, for practical purposes, very remote.

I think the chance of an inspection of a US webmaster doing non-extreme sites strictly as a secondary producer is also very remote.

[Allfetish]

Originally Posted by Toby

I think the chance of an inspection of a US webmaster doing non-extreme sites strictly as a secondary producer is also very remote.

The whole secondary producer thing is bullshit. Does Bing have 2257 for all the porn videos they are catching with their preview feature? People are saying that even if they remove the video Bing still has it cached. Technically THAT should be a violation of 2257 law, no?

A secondary producer should ONLY be required to keep records as to the source of the content, preferably a link to the primary producer's 2257 statement. That would make sense and is all that is needed to protect against CP. But Nooooo....