Double URL Watermarked Content

[HowlingWulf]

I think it's BS. I don't want to use content that watermarks with the site I'm promoting as well as another 'all access pass' watermark to get type-ins. It's bad enough when some programs watermark with their mega site that affiliates can't promote. I know for my own sites, type-ins are as much as 15% of my traffic.

[NY Jester]

Originally Posted by HowlingWulf

I think it's BS. I don't want to use content that watermarks with the site I'm promoting as well as another 'all access pass' watermark to get type-ins. It's bad enough when some programs watermark with their mega site that affiliates can't promote. I know for my own sites, type-ins are as much as 15% of my traffic.

Hey Wulfie..how'd ya know it was the all access pass that was the extra watermark


I should have said in my original posts, I know why its being done. And the reason I asked is because, I dont want to screw the submitter by rejecting the site just because the program(s) he is pushing is using the policy.

[HowlingWulf]

Originally Posted by NY Jester

Hey Wulfie..how'd ya know it was the all access pass that was the extra watermark


I should have said in my original posts, I know why its being done. And the reason I asked is because, I dont want to screw the submitter by rejecting the site just because the program(s) he is pushing is using the policy.

I just ran into it yesterday when I went to look at a sponsor's latest content. Not only double watermarked, but it's so big it's more an advertisement of 'TYPE THIS URL IN SO I DON'T HAVE TO PAY THIS AFFILIATE'. I can understand why they do it, I hope they understand why I won't use it.

I'd say it's submitter's choice if he wants to use that content or not.