Thumbs linking directly to images

LD · 2007-06-08, 04:44 PM

I use a little program I really like for galleries called Arles. It creates an image html page for each image which the thumbs link to. I noticed many submit sites do allow this. Just wondering, why is that? Security..quality perhaps?

Porn Junkie · 2007-06-09, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LusciousDelight

I use a little program I really like for galleries called Arles. It creates an image html page for each image which the thumbs link to. I noticed many submit sites do allow this. Just wondering, why is that? Security..quality perhaps?

I think you mean to say many submit sites DO NOT allow this

I think its cause your building a free site and the surfer is coming for free porn. Shouldn't be messing up the images with ads and shit which would just piss me right off.

I have seen 1, maybe 2 link lists that would allow it, but don't remember which ones. I just don't do it, not a good practice.

virgohippy · 2007-06-09, 03:53 AM

I think the reason many don't like 'em is because it takes more work to check each page at review time.

LOR used to accept 'em.

I use 'em on my own freesites listed in my own network. If the horny devils want my free porn they can see my advertisements free of charge too.

LD · 2007-06-09, 11:48 AM

Porn Junkie, I did mean do say they do "not" allow them. Also, I did figure out how to get Arles to link directly to the image, so maybe I'll get accepted more often now. The html linking was much faster, but we all got rules. . .

ronnie · 2007-06-12, 08:55 PM

I think the other big thing is most people that use to do pictures on html pages also put all kinds of ads on those pages. So the surfer would get too many ads pushed on them. And it would also be another place some less than honest webmasters could cover in ads AFTER getting approved.

secretagentwilly · 2007-06-12, 09:09 PM

Am I missing something? Are you saying, on original galleries, the thumbs aren't supposed to be linked to the bigger picture? Are the pictures not supposed be linked?

ronnie · 2007-06-12, 09:41 PM

Bigger pictures are not suppose to be on html pages, well most LL's don't accept those kinds of sites. Thumbs should just link to big pics.

secretagentwilly · 2007-06-12, 09:43 PM

Okay...thanks for the clarification...I was thinking that's the way it goes, because I couldn't picture it (pun intended) any other way...but the thread talked about hidden ads and that confused me because I'm a simpleton...thanks again..

danutzupmp · 2007-06-14, 03:27 PM

They do not admit that exactly because of ads that webmaster put on that extra html

2007-06-08, 04:44 PM	#1
LD wtfwjd? Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,103	Thumbs linking directly to images I use a little program I really like for galleries called Arles. It creates an image html page for each image which the thumbs link to. I noticed many submit sites do allow this. Just wondering, why is that? Security..quality perhaps? __________________ Artisteer Wordpress Theme Generator Create Custom Themes! My Little Network

2007-06-09, 03:53 AM	#3
virgohippy Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push. Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: California Posts: 1,679	I think the reason many don't like 'em is because it takes more work to check each page at review time. LOR used to accept 'em. I use 'em on my own freesites listed in my own network. If the horny devils want my free porn they can see my advertisements free of charge too. __________________ ~Warm and Fuzzy.

2007-06-09, 11:48 AM	#4
LD wtfwjd? Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,103	Porn Junkie, I did mean do say they do "not" allow them. Also, I did figure out how to get Arles to link directly to the image, so maybe I'll get accepted more often now. The html linking was much faster, but we all got rules. . . __________________ Artisteer Wordpress Theme Generator Create Custom Themes! My Little Network Last edited by LD; 2007-06-09 at 11:50 AM..

2007-06-14, 03:27 PM	#9
danutzupmp If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: May 2007 Location: Romania, Bucuresti Posts: 37	They do not admit that exactly because of ads that webmaster put on that extra html __________________ www.bangrealm.com

2007-06-12, 08:55 PM	#5
ronnie Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right. Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: midwest Posts: 2,274	I think the other big thing is most people that use to do pictures on html pages also put all kinds of ads on those pages. So the surfer would get too many ads pushed on them. And it would also be another place some less than honest webmasters could cover in ads AFTER getting approved.

2007-06-12, 09:09 PM	#6
secretagentwilly You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California Posts: 637	Am I missing something? Are you saying, on original galleries, the thumbs aren't supposed to be linked to the bigger picture? Are the pictures not supposed be linked?

2007-06-12, 09:41 PM	#7
ronnie Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right. Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: midwest Posts: 2,274	Bigger pictures are not suppose to be on html pages, well most LL's don't accept those kinds of sites. Thumbs should just link to big pics.

2007-06-12, 09:43 PM	#8
secretagentwilly You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California Posts: 637	Okay...thanks for the clarification...I was thinking that's the way it goes, because I couldn't picture it (pun intended) any other way...but the thread talked about hidden ads and that confused me because I'm a simpleton...thanks again..