Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Possible Cheaters (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   a affiliate who uses my content for evil (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=10009)

Ramster 2004-08-11 12:25 PM

Torn DIDN'T shut the guy down. He asked the guy to remove the content by emailing him and emailing his host. That's it. His host shut him down so he needs to deal with the host by not giving him the 24 hours Torn gave him to remove the galleries.

Cut Torn a break, he's not an ass. ;)

Thumb TGPS that skim are here to stay and a huge part of sponsors making money. Be real! Call it CJ or whatever you want but they send valid customers to the hosted galleries that do buy memberships.

Tommy 2004-08-11 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ramster
Torn DIDN'T shut the guy down. He asked the guy to remove the content by emailing him and emailing his host.
ohh I didnt know that. That changes things a bit

I am sorry I should have read the thread better

Greenguy 2004-08-11 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tommy
Can a sponsor tell you that you cant have consoles on your site
or use toolbars or even spyware. Can they cancel you because they dont like your advertising methods.....

Buy an email list & then spam a sponsor's site & see how fast you get terminated :D

Jim 2004-08-11 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greenguy
Buy an email list & then spam a sponsor's site & see how fast you get terminated :D
Only if the sponsor get's a lot of complaints. Otherwise, with most sponsors...the advertiser is golden.

Tommy 2004-08-11 12:48 PM

Please........... we all know nobody get terminated for spaming

crockett 2004-08-11 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ramster
Torn DIDN'T shut the guy down. He asked the guy to remove the content by emailing him and emailing his host. That's it. His host shut him down so he needs to deal with the host by not giving him the 24 hours Torn gave him to remove the galleries.

Cut Torn a break, he's not an ass. ;)

Thumb TGPS that skim are here to stay and a huge part of sponsors making money. Be real! Call it CJ or whatever you want but they send valid customers to the hosted galleries that do buy memberships.

well I know my personal 1st post might have been a bit to strong on the issue and I do believe Thorn has every right in the world to dictate how his content is being used. However the facts I was pointing out is it's general knowledge that TGP's use these kinds of methods to gain traffic and most of us do not conceder it cheating. So I personally think if he didn't want traffic from sites that skim, it should be clearly stated in a TOS. I think most of this drama comes from people that either don't agree with traffic trading or just don't understand it's benefits.

I personally took offense to someone being called a called or implied a cheater simply because I conduct the same sort of traffic trading techniques and I in no way conceder myself a cheater. I typically stay away from pop up's but in all honestly adult webmasters have become far too nice to surfers in not having pop ups on their sites and so on. Pop up's still seem to be a very accepted means of making money in mainstream sites so why not still in adult? Of course I'm not talking pop up hells but 1 pop up or a exit console never hurt anyone IMO.

As far as the toolbar install goes I think koot explained it was from the free host. I tend to believe him being I've seen it happen a few times coming from free hosts or free counters such as porngraph.

tgpguy 2004-08-11 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jim
I agree with you almost 100%. If I was the sponsor in question, I would be happy to let anyone do anything they wanted with content I "gave away". To me...it's just good business. I have had the same feelings since the very beginning and don't think they will ever change.

But, if you look at Torn's first post, you will see that one of the problems is the content was being used" to help install whatever crap he is trying to install." I believe that would be "the damn "xxx toolbar"" that you mention or something just as bad. Would I go out policing my content to make sure it wasn't being used for that...No. But, if I stumbled on someone using my content to install something, I think I would be pissed off. I would have written to the advertiser and asked him to stop. I would not have gotten any host involved until I was sure that didn't work. And I would not have terminated the advertiser's account. But, that's just me. I also believe that if you are going to "give away" content and you have rules about using it, you should make sure they are posted clearly.

Until GreenguyandJim, I did nothing but run and market affiliate programs. I believe that is why my thoughts on this subject differ so much from the other regulars on GreenguyandJim. I have always been about the business of making money for the affiliate program. I don't think you will see sponsors coming out of the woodwork saying they would allow this type of thing. Just as you will not see sponsors saying they allow email spamming. But, most of them do. That's just the way it is.

Torn, you and I should really sit down and talk in Florida :)

Jim,

You are absolutely right 100%..........but this thread has taken on a life of it's own. I think it departed from the original intent about reply number 3. If I was a sponsor offering content for surfers I would be highly pissed. Nasty Dollars has people on staff to ensure that their content is not "stolen" or used in any way not in accordance with their TOS. Skimming is not a good thing at all, as a matter of fact I dislike it immensly, but it serves it's purpose in that if you strike a balance your site can grow in size and get bookmarks. I think most will agree that this is simply a collision of two different "worlds" within the online adult community. And at the end of the day GG would be able to step into the TGP game and have a lot easier time at it than I would have stepping into the link list game, it is all about traffic and sellingn |bananna|

tgpguy 2004-08-11 02:52 PM

And on the other hand, I think Torn is well on his way to learning a valuable lesson in this biz wether he knows it or not............Just a damn shame it is going to eat up an entire sector of the market to teach him that lesson |sad|

I wish him the best as I don't think he would have wanted it to happen that way. As a matter of fact I would be willing to bet you that a ton of the TGP webmasters are looking at his site and having a good look at the content so they can recognize it at a glance and swiftly decline any gallery or sponsor link submitted to them promoting his stuff........indeed it is sad |sad|

rowan 2004-08-11 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Meadint
Rowan, the issue is not about posting thumbs of other peoples images. That is toltally legal ... as long as the thumbnail is linked to the actual image (gallery). The problem here is the skimming: That a certain percentage of the clicks will go to something else than the image (gallery). There has been no ruling about that by any court as far as I know.

I agree with Greenguy and Torn that it is probably technical illegal to post thumbnails on a thumb tgp that skims a certain percentage of traffic to trades. I don't really see why Torn should put in his T&C that use of his images on a skimming thumb tgp is not allowed, when it is probably technically illegal according to the copyright legislation.

I may be wrong, but I don't recall seeing anything in that ruling saying "thumbnails are fine so long as they link to the original content" ... it just says that using thumbnails does not violate copyright.

rowan 2004-08-11 05:08 PM

And on a lighter note...
 
http://www.katcash.com/htm/content.htm

Every link I try off this page goes to a 404 redirect with a couple of pops.

What were we saying about stealing traffic? :) :)

Torn Rose 2004-08-11 06:05 PM

Thanks rowan for pointing this bug out. I made all my galleries and take full responsibility. They worked for me when I read your post but not for my wife, and thanks to good timing my best friend came over 2 mins later and being the script wiz that he is it took us 5 mins to find what the issue was.



This is somehow included in my hosted movies, maybe due to the embedded videos, I’m not sure. Try them in IE and then let me know if they work.

Unfortunately we are on out way out the door and I will fix this bug as soon as I can.

Bangwang 2004-08-11 06:32 PM

For The Record:

Silvercash has no problem with links to our hosted galleries from a thumb of our content, having a percentage of clicks redirected for tgp traffic trades.

Why would we???


If you have a question... E me..

bangwang @ silver.......



Richard
3688149

Jim 2004-08-11 07:12 PM

Bangwang
Good to see you, welcome to GreenguyandJim.

Greenguy 2004-08-11 07:35 PM

Hey Bangwang |waves|

Man, this thread is bring people out of the woodwork!

Cleo 2004-08-11 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torn
Thanks rowan for pointing this bug out. I made all my galleries and take full responsibility. They worked for me when I read your post but not for my wife, and thanks to good timing my best friend came over 2 mins later and being the script wiz that he is it took us 5 mins to find what the issue was.



This is somehow included in my hosted movies, maybe due to the embedded videos, I’m not sure. Try them in IE and then let me know if they work.

Unfortunately we are on out way out the door and I will fix this bug as soon as I can.

I didn't add your stuff in because of this. I don't use IE and as soon as I got a 404 I stopped looking at them. Been meaning to mention it to you but kept on forgetting.

Bangwang 2004-08-11 08:29 PM

Hey Jim ... Hey Mark


I'm just a board luker :)



See you in Hollywood?

Mike 2004-08-11 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bangwang
For The Record:

Silvercash has no problem with links to our hosted galleries from a thumb of our content, having a percentage of clicks redirected for tgp traffic trades.

Why would we???

If you have a question... E me..

bangwang @ silver.......

Richard
3688149

Bangwang,

Sounds good to me... I was pretty sure you were gonna say that thou.
I'll keep loading my traffic off in your face then :)

Greenguy 2004-08-11 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bangwang
See you in Hollywood?
Yes, Jim & I will both be there :)

LadyMischief 2004-08-11 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tgpguy
Jim,

You are absolutely right 100%..........but this thread has taken on a life of it's own. I think it departed from the original intent about reply number 3. If I was a sponsor offering content for surfers I would be highly pissed. Nasty Dollars has people on staff to ensure that their content is not "stolen" or used in any way not in accordance with their TOS. Skimming is not a good thing at all, as a matter of fact I dislike it immensly, but it serves it's purpose in that if you strike a balance your site can grow in size and get bookmarks. I think most will agree that this is simply a collision of two different "worlds" within the online adult community. And at the end of the day GG would be able to step into the TGP game and have a lot easier time at it than I would have stepping into the link list game, it is all about traffic and sellingn |bananna|

Funny, last time I saw, Nastydollar's TGP's skimmed too ;)

KCat 2004-08-11 10:50 PM

Wow! I love Torn & Kat, but this is nuts!

From a gallery submitter perspective:


There isn't a single no-skim thumb TGP that I submit to.

That means that 6 or 7 or 8 times out of 10, Kat's thumb would go to the gallery I submitted. The remainder would go to the TGP's trades. So...

If I built a gallery out of Kat's free content & submitted to my list, would:

I have my affiliate account deleted?

My partner accounts be getting C&Ds?

Useless 2004-08-11 11:09 PM

On a more positive note - look at all of the brand spanking new board members this thread dragged in.
|lightsabe

Stouch 2004-08-12 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KCat
Wow! I love Torn & Kat, but this is nuts!

From a gallery submitter perspective:


There isn't a single no-skim thumb TGP that I submit to.

That means that 6 or 7 or 8 times out of 10, Kat's thumb would go to the gallery I submitted. The remainder would go to the TGP's trades. So...

If I built a gallery out of Kat's free content & submitted to my list, would:

I have my affiliate account deleted?

My partner accounts be getting C&Ds?

Thats what I wanted to know...

LadyMischief 2004-08-12 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KCat
Wow! I love Torn & Kat, but this is nuts!

From a gallery submitter perspective:


There isn't a single no-skim thumb TGP that I submit to.

That means that 6 or 7 or 8 times out of 10, Kat's thumb would go to the gallery I submitted. The remainder would go to the TGP's trades. So...

If I built a gallery out of Kat's free content & submitted to my list, would:

I have my affiliate account deleted?

My partner accounts be getting C&Ds?

Dealing with the volume of this kind of stuff that I do, I would just say "screw it" to any sponsor that might give me trouble.. My partner accounts are valuable to me, and having one program going around causing unneccessary bullshit with the tgp owners that I've built a relationship with over a long period of time would be... Absolutely infuriating. No way in hell would I promote a sponsor like that.. I can understand protecting your content and wanting to make the most out of each hit, but tgp traffic can be valuable (I should know), and for them to try to dictate what the tgp owners can do, directly or indirectly, is absolutely ridiculous.

justmyopinion 2004-08-12 10:49 AM

Everybody who is running an affiliate program (including Torn) should listen to the advice Jim gave by telling what he would have done in a similar situation:

Quote:

Originally posted by Jim

I would have written to the advertiser and asked him to stop. I would not have gotten any host involved until I was sure that didn't work. And I would not have terminated the advertiser's account. But, that's just me. I also believe that if you are going to "give away" content and you have rules about using it, you should make sure they are posted clearly.

Listening to Jim's advice will save affiliate programs and affiliates from a lot of unnecessary drama.

justmyopinion 2004-08-12 11:05 AM

Torn,

You have made many mistakes each of which will probably cost you affiliates:

1.
You sent a C&D to your affiliate's host without giving your affiliate time to respond to your complaint.

2.a
You ran to a board to complain about an affiliate without giving your affiliate time to respond to your complaint.
2.b.
You posted your affiliate's whois info and domains on a board called possible cheaters and implied that he is a cheater whose account you already terminated and telling that you wrote a C&D to him and to his host.
Again without giving your affiliate time to respond to your complaint.

3.
You posted your affiliate's private email address and home address on a board.
(this isn't much of a tragedy in this case since Kloot had his home address listed in his domains whois info but about 50% of webmasters don't have their home address in their whois information - including Torn aka PO Box 8xxx - and I think Torn wouldn't be happy if I started posting his home address on message boards.)

4.You were insulting and abusive towards your affiliate by calling him "little piss ant".


These 4 acts by you made sure that I will NEVER touch your program.
I suspect that many other affiliates don't want to see this kind of behaviour from affiliate programs.

Tips for affiliate programs:
Do NOT use boards as the first stop for solving problems (this applies also to affiliates).
Respect your affiliates privacy.(this applies also to affiliates).
Act respectfully towards your affiliates and other people (this applies also to affiliates).
Do NOT make rash decisions in the heat of the moment (this applies also to affiliates).


You will be forever infamous as the clueless program owner who didn't get skimming and tgps but to me you will be just another example of a person who runs to the boards, makes rash decisions, doesn't care about their affiliate's privacy and acts abusively.

Good luck with the path you have chosen.


-justmyopinion

LadyMischief 2004-08-12 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by justmyopinion
Torn,

You have made many mistakes each of which will probably cost you affiliates:

1.
You sent a C&D to your affiliate's host without giving your affiliate time to respond to your complaint.

2.a
You ran to a board to complain about an affiliate without giving your affiliate time to respond to your complaint.
2.b.
You posted your affiliate's whois info and domains on a board called possible cheaters and implied that he is a cheater whose account you already terminated and telling that you wrote a C&D to him and to his host.
Again without giving your affiliate time to respond to your complaint.

3.
You posted your affiliate's private email address and home address on a board.
(this isn't much of a tragedy in this case since Kloot had his home address listed in his domains whois info but about 50% of webmasters don't have their home address in their whois information - including Torn aka PO Box 8xxx - and I think Torn wouldn't be happy if I started posting his home address on message boards.)

4.You were insulting and abusive towards your affiliate by calling him "little piss ant".


These 4 acts by you made sure that I will NEVER touch your program.
I suspect that many other affiliates don't want to see this kind of behaviour from affiliate programs.

Tips for affiliate programs:
Do NOT use boards as the first stop for solving problems (this applies also to affiliates).
Respect your affiliates privacy.(this applies also to affiliates).
Act respectfully towards your affiliates and other people (this applies also to affiliates).
Do NOT make rash decisions in the heat of the moment (this applies also to affiliates).


You will be forever infamous as the clueless program owner who didn't get skimming and tgps but to me you will be just another example of a person who runs to the boards, makes rash decisions, doesn't care about their affiliate's privacy and acts abusively.

Good luck with the path you have chosen.


-justmyopinion

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Bill 2004-08-12 04:41 PM

Leaving aside the question of the skim, which I never found very interesting personally...

Everybody thinks it's just peachy that this kloot character was autodownloading something that set off virus warnings, then?

All of Kloots trades think it's just fine that Kloots thumbtgp was apparently downloading some kind of exploit?

I know, I know, the only proof that's left is Torn's claim, but is it your position that Kloot was innocent of any wrongdoing?

Who's trading with Kloot? What was the url of this innocent thumbtgp?

crockett 2004-08-12 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bill
Leaving aside the question of the skim, which I never found very interesting personally...

Everybody thinks it's just peachy that this kloot character was autodownloading something that set off virus warnings, then?

All of Kloots trades think it's just fine that Kloots thumbtgp was apparently downloading some kind of exploit?

I know, I know, the only proof that's left is Torn's claim, but is it your position that Kloot was innocent of any wrongdoing?

Who's trading with Kloot? What was the url of this innocent thumbtgp?

It seems you didn't read the whole topic.. the exploit was coming from the free host not koot.. but he did have the pop up which is not a big deal IMO. I don't know if you ever used porngraph counter but they did the same thing and started auto installing toolbars via their counter and killed a great service.

Bill 2004-08-12 05:08 PM

I read the whole post. So you're telling me that Kloot never once visited his own site and noticed that his oh-so-mysterious freehost was downloading exploits on him?

Or maybe the "freehost" started it just minutes before Torn checked the link?

Blaming it on the freehost is the oldest fucking trick in the book.

I know all about porngraph. So, are you claiming he still had a porngragh counter on there and that was the source of the exploit? (I know you're not, you are using it as an example. And anybody who was dumb enough to still have a pg counter downloading toolbars off his siite months after it was discovered and discussed on every fucking board in existence deserves no sympathy.)

Who was the freehost owner? Let's ask him about his exploit autodownloading freehost. What's the evidence that the malware was from the freehost?

Who are Kloots trades? Is it any surprise none of them have spoken up?

tgpguy 2004-08-12 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Funny, last time I saw, Nastydollar's TGP's skimmed too ;)
I bet they do, I am talking about "really" stealing the content and not just "skimming" |peace|

justsexxx 2004-08-12 07:31 PM

I think the problem here is that some paysite owners lost the reality woth how tgp's work nowadays.

Of course, when our thumbs do lead to autodialers/install and other sponsor, we will complain. But just a do a little more research. Most TGP's skim traffic, and sometimes THOSE trades add autodialing shit etc. It's not that the affiliate link directly to that.

When you don't want that your content is used for skimming, you should add that explicit in the terms, and FHG area, since it's a common way of doing business nowadays. That's what I mean with keep up to date.

Also I doubt if you saw such thumb on teeniefiles, madthumbs you had acted the same way.

Andre

sixzeros 2004-08-12 07:39 PM

Sixzeros of Comus Thumbs TGP script here.

I just want to say.. the Comus Thumbs network is getting bigger, somewhere around 10mil to 15mil surfers a day.

99.999% of them are skimming to trades.

99.999% of them are running hosted galleries.

If you dont want to be on the Comus network, then get a message to me, and let me know your domain, I can make sure you get purged.

I think most sponsors would rather that I added them though?

KCat 2004-08-12 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bill
Leaving aside the question of the skim, which I never found very interesting personally...

Everybody thinks it's just peachy that this kloot character was autodownloading something that set off virus warnings, then?


It's not peachy, it's just not relevant.

Obviously Torn doesn't want his site & his wife's image associated with a site using trojans or exploits. That's a no brainer. If that was the only reason he'd turfed the account, this thread would've ended on page 1.

What *is* relevant is how a "NO using free content or FHGs on TGPs with skims" policy affects honest, hardworking webmasters. There needs to be a clear list of sponsors who won't allow this.

Bill 2004-08-12 08:42 PM

I see your point of view Kcat, but I see things as being exactly opposite. I think the skim is irrelevant, and the exploit is the issue.

Torn didn't know about the skim. It may come as a shock to some TGP people, but there's a lot of adult biz that doesn't know the details of forced trading.

But his first point, and his first reaction, was to the autodownloaded exploit. Then he meets the skim, which he doesn't know, and gets doubly pissed.

But the real crime here is the autodownloaded exploit. How many thousands of dollars have been spent by just the people reading this dealing with exploit infected computers? And it's not the email viruses that are fucking us, nobody here is that dumb, it's the scumware and toolbars and malicious dialers autodownloaded and deceitfully downloaded.

Now Torn knows about the skim, and this will cause sponsors everywhere to clarify their policies. That's good. The skim was never threatened.

But these fucking exploit downloaders are daily fucking every single one of us out of money, if you'll excuse my language.

Alphawolf 2004-08-12 08:50 PM

Sorry to break into the meaningful conversation...

I read this thread and the gfy thread.

Found it pretty interesting reading- not having a clue about TGP's.

There's no school for adult, so whatever one learns off boards is taken as the way to do things.

...until you read otherwise or see people in real life and chat about it.

Stouch 2004-08-12 09:35 PM

Bill, the use of exploits/dialers have nothing to do with copyright infringement or any other gripe Torn may have. That is (or theoretically is) Kloots business decision. Torn can climb as many walls or beat up as many small people as he likes over hitting a page with a dialer ~ but it aint illegal in the context of his gripe with Kloot.

The use of his pics to build a TGP is his gripe...

If Kloot had been forcing trades via a textlink as opposed to a thumbpic taken from his promo material, then this whole situation wouldnt have arisen, dialer or no dialer.

Bill 2004-08-12 10:06 PM

i can't be sure what was in Torn's mind, but I agree copyright infringement is the tool, the legal weapon that makes this case so interesting.

However, this situation has multiple parts. Torn is within his rights to send a copyright warning to the host. We don't have to agree with it, but he has the legal right to do it.

Then, the host owner came here and said "Hey, wasn't us that shut kloot down, we just passed on the message". But because Kloot WAS shut down by someone, it makes a big splash, because it's such a dramatic example of the power of copyright infringement claims as a weapon.

But, it turns out it's Kloots "friend", the freehost owner, who shut him down, not Torn. Torn was as surprised as anybody that the guy was shut down so hard.

So, it's not really Torn who has gutted Kloot, it's Kloots friend, who is also presumably the one who installed the 3 autodownloading "somethings" that tripped Torn's norton.

Does Torn have the absolute legal authority to say "You can't use my content in the skim.". Clearly, YES. Is it a good business decision if you want to be used on TGPs? Probably not but who the fuck knows? TGP owners may think the world revolves around that traffic but it don't mean he couldn't make plenty without TGP traffic.

It was said earlier, this debate wouldn't have lasted a page if it had just been about autodialers, but that is what it's about.

It's an unintended side effect that the copyright threat was enough to scare Kloots cheating "freehost" "friend" into shutting down his crime operation loading toolbars onto the stream of TGP traffic.

justmyopinion 2004-08-13 01:22 AM

I'm reposting this advice by Jim in the hope that more people would learn to act professionally:

Everybody who is running an affiliate program (including Torn) should listen to the advice Jim gave by telling what he would have done in a similar situation:

Quote:

Originally posted by Jim

I would have written to the advertiser and asked him to stop. I would not have gotten any host involved until I was sure that didn't work. And I would not have terminated the advertiser's account. But, that's just me. I also believe that if you are going to "give away" content and you have rules about using it, you should make sure they are posted clearly.


KCat 2004-08-13 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bill
I see your point of view Kcat, but I see things as being exactly opposite. I think the skim is irrelevant, and the exploit is the issue.
The skim is relevant to me because I submit to TGPs that skim.

The exploit is irrelevant to me because it's obviously wrong/cheating & I don't cheat, use exploits, dialers etc. etc. Doesn't apply to me.

If this was just a thread about another webmaster who's got dodgy shit on his site, I'd file it under list of sites to blacklist. End of story. But considering the skim "cheating" is a major issue affecting a lot of honest webmasters. Does that make more sense?

justmyopinion 2004-08-13 01:49 AM

I can understand Torn being pissed if he thought he was being cheated because he didn't understand skimming.

I can understand Torn being pissed at the exploits the freehost was trying to install.

BUT BEING PISSED DOES NOT GIVE A PERSON THE RIGHT TO ACT ABUSIVELY!

Being pissed does NOT excuse this kind of BAD behaviour:
running to the boards, posting affiliate's private information, sending a C&D to the affiliates host, calling their affiliate "little piss ant", and deleting the affiliates account - Doing all this WITHOUT first giving the affiliate time to respond to the complaint.


Torn's mistakes:

1.
He sent a C&D to his affiliate's host without giving his affiliate time to respond to the complaint.

2.a
He ran to a board to complain about an affiliate without giving his affiliate time to respond to the complaint.
2.b.
He posted his affiliate's whois info and domains on a board called possible cheaters and implied that the affiliate is a cheater whose account he already terminated and telling that he wrote a C&D to the affiliate and to their host.
Again without giving his affiliate time to respond to the complaint.

3.
He posted his affiliate's private email address and home address on a board.
(this isn't much of a tragedy in this case since Kloot had his home address listed in his domains whois info but about 50% of webmasters don't have their home address in their whois information - including Torn aka PO Box 8xxx - and I think Torn wouldn't be happy if I started posting his home address on message boards.)

4.He was insulting and abusive towards his affiliate by calling him "little piss ant".


Do you want to join an affiliate program who treats their affiliates like Torn?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc