Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 10:56 PM
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 1,230
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 04:18 PM
|
|
Replies: 394
Views: 37,096
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 03:34 PM
|
|
Replies: 394
Views: 37,096
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 02:57 PM
|
|
Replies: 14
Views: 2,227
|
|
Forum: Link Lists & Getting Listed
2005-03-31, 02:08 PM
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,277
From: ...
From:
http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?p=135630#135630
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/3/prweb213516.htm
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 01:29 PM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 2,722
Remember years and years ago, that McDonalds...
Remember years and years ago, that McDonalds commercial with the Tractor driving over rolling green fields with the cows in the background? That was filmed in central New Jersey.
The John Deere...
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-31, 01:16 PM
|
|
Replies: 28
Views: 3,987
Ebay removed the item.
Invalid Item
This...
Ebay removed the item.
Invalid Item
This listing (5764427760) has been removed by eBay or is no longer available. Please make sure that you've entered the item number correctly.
If the item was...
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 12:54 PM
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 1,727
|
|
Forum: Programming & Scripting
2005-03-31, 12:52 PM
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 1,179
I've run it for a while, but, I haven't really...
I've run it for a while, but, I haven't really seen much of a benefit yet. I tagged all of my domains that would never send mail to fail any SPF request, and have tagged my main email domains with...
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-31, 12:06 PM
|
|
Replies: 394
Views: 37,096
maybe 2pm GMT - Greenguy loves that timezone...
maybe 2pm GMT - Greenguy loves that timezone thing, so, the only time that wouldn't be confusing would be GMT.
Or, perhaps 2pm on the International date line -- that would make it roughly 14 hours...
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-31, 11:35 AM
|
|
Replies: 120
Views: 23,339
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-31, 12:55 AM
|
|
Replies: 28
Views: 3,987
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-30, 09:56 PM
|
|
Replies: 120
Views: 23,339
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-30, 08:42 PM
|
|
Replies: 394
Views: 37,096
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-30, 05:03 PM
|
|
Replies: 394
Views: 37,096
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-30, 11:58 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 1,749
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-29, 02:35 PM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 2,165
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-29, 02:26 PM
|
|
Replies: 120
Views: 23,339
Here's the url at the top of the page: ...
Here's the url at the top of the page:
http://best-adult-dating.com/?src=fuskerleww
mcd@tsavo:~$ telnet best-adult-dating.com 80
Trying 62.232.36.23...
Connected to unityhosting.com.
Escape...
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-29, 02:10 AM
|
|
Replies: 70
Views: 12,770
slight leak in the rule, adjusted with...
slight leak in the rule, adjusted with yourdomain\.com (thanks Swedguy)
RewriteEngine on
# leave this line in allow empty referrers, remove to disallow empty referrers
RewriteCond...
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-28, 09:48 PM
|
|
Replies: 70
Views: 12,770
This rule allows empty referrers:
...
This rule allows empty referrers:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$ [NC]
GrandmaScrotum, phew, that ruleset has been floating around the net for a long time, and, its got many common errors. ...
|
|
Forum: Chit Chat
2005-03-28, 05:12 PM
|
|
Replies: 14
Views: 1,796
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-28, 04:52 PM
|
|
Replies: 60
Views: 4,910
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-28, 04:32 PM
|
|
Replies: 70
Views: 12,770
So, with that, we have:
RewriteEngine on
#...
So, with that, we have:
RewriteEngine on
# optionally allow empty referrers, remove to disallow empty referrers
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}...
|
|
Forum: Products and/or Services Offered
2005-03-28, 02:57 PM
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 1,205
|
|
Forum: General Business Knowledge
2005-03-28, 02:24 PM
|
|
Replies: 70
Views: 12,770
you are correct, your method is faster.
with...
you are correct, your method is faster.
with 20 concurrent threads, 100k requests, no keepalives, .46 seconds faster and 3.4 tps faster.
oddly, at 20/10k/no keepalives, the margin tilts the...
|
