Greenguy's Board - View Single Post

GeorgeTH · 2005-04-15, 11:16 PM

Although I tend to swear a lot about MicroShit and Windows, I must say overall XP Pro is rather stable... Of all the versions I have used I would rate from best to worse (OS doing what was required at the time):
1. XP Pro (by a long margin)
2. Win 98 SE
3. Win 3.11
4. Win 98
and equal fifth (instable or simply useless):
Win ME
Win 2.0 (that was in 1986 or so...)

There are many other pieces of software, many included as apps within WIN, which are giving me the shits, but as an OS in general I guess XP Pro does what it's supposed to do. Just wish MS would NOT hide so many features in sub>sub>sub-menues...

2005-04-15, 11:16 PM	#50
GeorgeTH Don't let a programmer design your front-end pages! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: currently on the road in CA Posts: 781	Although I tend to swear a lot about MicroShit and Windows, I must say overall XP Pro is rather stable... Of all the versions I have used I would rate from best to worse (OS doing what was required at the time): 1. XP Pro (by a long margin) 2. Win 98 SE 3. Win 3.11 4. Win 98 and equal fifth (instable or simply useless): Win ME Win 2.0 (that was in 1986 or so...) There are many other pieces of software, many included as apps within WIN, which are giving me the shits, but as an OS in general I guess XP Pro does what it's supposed to do. Just wish MS would NOT hide so many features in sub>sub>sub-menues... __________________ Have a nice day!